Skip to main content

Why nothing is enough in the field of physics?

Why nothing is enough in the field of physics?

We could form this question in the form, "why scientists are looking for more and more smaller and high energy particles in the Universe"? Why we are creating more and more powerful systems, what can find smaller and smaller particles. And maybe we would someday find the point, where energy would get the "astral form", and that is the opposite for the form of quarks, and we can think that the physical form of atoms, electrons, and other fundamental particles is so-called "kinetic" or "crystallize", and the form of energy would be "quantum fog" or "astral", so sometimes somebody has asked, "is the material only the crystallized energy".

And annihilation reaction, where antimatter and matter would contact and all of their mass turn to energy are supporting that thing. So the material is only the kinetic version of energy, if we want to say this thing like that way.

The idea of those people is that they want to find the point, where the material is transforming the energy and the opposite way. If we could find out that point or gate, where the energy is turning to material, we could find something bigger than ever before. We know that somewhere in the quantum world is the extreme particle, what is turning to the energy, and if we would see that particle, we can simulate the opposite reaction. But what is the form of that particle?

Is it stable or is it like some kind of quantum version of "the elastic bound", what can move to another space and form to another? That would be the most interesting particle of the quantum Universe, what we can ever create, or rather saying, what we can ever find. Then we are facing another strange particle and that is gluon. That particle keeps quarks together, and sometimes the form or essence of the gluon is thought to be a key to see, what things are forming the quarks.

When we are thinking about the thing, what is called the "super spring", we must ask, is that thing the particle, what is mentioned at the beginning of this text. So if our super spring is the quantum version of elastic bound that means that this particle is like clew, what the super spring forms. And if that clew, what has name quark, would open, the super spring would slip to energy. And that thing would be very interesting.

So what would we need to observe this kind of case? The thing is that those super springs would not act like other fundamental particles. That makes problems for creating observation of those particles. So what kind of thing the "super spring" would be? The thing is that if the form of this thing is the wire, we must think, the reason, why this wire would turn to the clew and form the quarks?

Is there a tiny electric force, or force what effects a similar way with electricity, and pulls the wire to ball? And what is the role of gluons in that process? Are gluons some kind of small black holes, what can turn the super spring in the shape, what we are known as quarks? Those are things, that are waiting for answers in the thing, what we are known as material.

And then we must understand that we see material everywhere, but we don't know much about it or it's the deepest form. What is the point, when the material turns to energy or is there the final form, or is the material acting like melting crystal? This kind of thing is interesting when we are starting to research the final particle between material and energy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of