How to find particles, which are more complicated to find than Higgs boson?
Since the quarks have been discovered, scientists have been thought, what would form quarks? Then the physicians found the thing, what is called as "super spring". That means that there was something inside quarks, and that thing would be something, that we cannot even think about. But how we can release those particles from inside the quarks? The finding of the Higgs boson has put the scientists in the front of the thing, that every time, when we are looking for new particle, we must create the new particle accelerators for creating the energy level, what is high enough for releasing the new, small and short life particle from the other particles.
The main problem in those tests, what are made in CERN and other acceleration laboratories on our planet, is that if we would create the system, what will shoot new particles out from other particles, we must always operate in the highest limits of the system, and the main problem in those impacts is that the trajectory, what the particle travels in the accelerator tube must not curve very tight, because if the curve is too tight and the energy level is too high, the particle would impact the wall of the accelerator. The thing that makes it possible to make observations of those short-living particles is the extreme speed, and impact energy, which would make time slowing in those particles, which would connect with other particles very shortly after the impact. And that's why the observation of particles like Higgs boson is very difficult.
Higgs boson was only the gate, which proved that many things are waiting for the finder.
But one of the main problems is the size, what the particle accelerators would need if we would want to find new particles, what might be even more revolutionary than the Higgs boson, what proved that there are many particles, what we cannot even imagine. Even if we cannot see the particle itself, we can see the shadow of the particle, and that shadow is seen in the minimum errors between the behavior of real particles and theoretical particles. And one of those errors is minimum changes in the trajectories of particles when they are traveling in the sensor chamber after the electron has been impacting with positron or proton.
That tells that there are more particles, what is more, difficult to find or confirm than Higgs boson ever could be. And Higgs boson is like the gate to those theoretical particles, which can tell us more about the born of the Universe. If we want to find out even the smallest particles in the Universe, we must make larges and larger particle accelerators, for creating the energy levels, which is making it possible to form the new particles or separate them from the quarks.
The need to make larger and larger particle accelerators has brought one hypothetical thought in the mind of scientists and that is, what we can create the extremely large Van Allen belt, we could form two ion rays or flows, what we can collide with extremely high levels of energy, and there is one thing, what puts limit to that machine, and it is that it must be made to the space. If this enormous accelerator would build on the moon to its equator, that the ring-shaped magnets are put in the line, and the particles are traveling between those rings. There is a possibility, that it would make time moving slower in the moon, which would cause some kind of problems.
But if we would use a series of satellites, in theory, nothing puts limits on the size of the particle accelerator. The virtualization of particle accelerators would make it possible to create extremely large concepts in the field of nuclear physics. In this model the physical form of the particle accelerator by using a series of satellites, which can use magnets to accelerate the flow of ions. In some visions, there would be made virtualized particle accelerator, where series of satellites are accelerating ions between them to the trajectory between Venus and Mercury, and those satellites can use solar power, and that would make possible to find new particles, what needs more energy than an accelerator, what created Higgs boson ever could create.
Those ions would consist of particles, what have opposite polarity, what keeps the ion ray in the form. And that allows creating the particle accelerator, what can be at the outside of the Oort cloud, and surround the entire solar system. The ion rays would travel in the chain of probably nuclear-powered satellites, which would drive ion rays between them. And in theory, we could make a linear accelerator between Sun and Alpha Centauri by using this technology, but the need for radioactive material and satellites is so large, that this thing would be theory forever. But theories are interesting, and maybe someday we would create massive linear accelerators to space, what length could be thousands of kilometers. They could revolutionize the science, and our way to see how the universe would work.
Since the quarks have been discovered, scientists have been thought, what would form quarks? Then the physicians found the thing, what is called as "super spring". That means that there was something inside quarks, and that thing would be something, that we cannot even think about. But how we can release those particles from inside the quarks? The finding of the Higgs boson has put the scientists in the front of the thing, that every time, when we are looking for new particle, we must create the new particle accelerators for creating the energy level, what is high enough for releasing the new, small and short life particle from the other particles.
The main problem in those tests, what are made in CERN and other acceleration laboratories on our planet, is that if we would create the system, what will shoot new particles out from other particles, we must always operate in the highest limits of the system, and the main problem in those impacts is that the trajectory, what the particle travels in the accelerator tube must not curve very tight, because if the curve is too tight and the energy level is too high, the particle would impact the wall of the accelerator. The thing that makes it possible to make observations of those short-living particles is the extreme speed, and impact energy, which would make time slowing in those particles, which would connect with other particles very shortly after the impact. And that's why the observation of particles like Higgs boson is very difficult.
Higgs boson was only the gate, which proved that many things are waiting for the finder.
But one of the main problems is the size, what the particle accelerators would need if we would want to find new particles, what might be even more revolutionary than the Higgs boson, what proved that there are many particles, what we cannot even imagine. Even if we cannot see the particle itself, we can see the shadow of the particle, and that shadow is seen in the minimum errors between the behavior of real particles and theoretical particles. And one of those errors is minimum changes in the trajectories of particles when they are traveling in the sensor chamber after the electron has been impacting with positron or proton.
That tells that there are more particles, what is more, difficult to find or confirm than Higgs boson ever could be. And Higgs boson is like the gate to those theoretical particles, which can tell us more about the born of the Universe. If we want to find out even the smallest particles in the Universe, we must make larges and larger particle accelerators, for creating the energy levels, which is making it possible to form the new particles or separate them from the quarks.
The need to make larger and larger particle accelerators has brought one hypothetical thought in the mind of scientists and that is, what we can create the extremely large Van Allen belt, we could form two ion rays or flows, what we can collide with extremely high levels of energy, and there is one thing, what puts limit to that machine, and it is that it must be made to the space. If this enormous accelerator would build on the moon to its equator, that the ring-shaped magnets are put in the line, and the particles are traveling between those rings. There is a possibility, that it would make time moving slower in the moon, which would cause some kind of problems.
But if we would use a series of satellites, in theory, nothing puts limits on the size of the particle accelerator. The virtualization of particle accelerators would make it possible to create extremely large concepts in the field of nuclear physics. In this model the physical form of the particle accelerator by using a series of satellites, which can use magnets to accelerate the flow of ions. In some visions, there would be made virtualized particle accelerator, where series of satellites are accelerating ions between them to the trajectory between Venus and Mercury, and those satellites can use solar power, and that would make possible to find new particles, what needs more energy than an accelerator, what created Higgs boson ever could create.
Those ions would consist of particles, what have opposite polarity, what keeps the ion ray in the form. And that allows creating the particle accelerator, what can be at the outside of the Oort cloud, and surround the entire solar system. The ion rays would travel in the chain of probably nuclear-powered satellites, which would drive ion rays between them. And in theory, we could make a linear accelerator between Sun and Alpha Centauri by using this technology, but the need for radioactive material and satellites is so large, that this thing would be theory forever. But theories are interesting, and maybe someday we would create massive linear accelerators to space, what length could be thousands of kilometers. They could revolutionize the science, and our way to see how the universe would work.
Comments
Post a Comment