Why we should talk more about the European parliament?
Nationalism is a big threat for the European Union, and what we must realize when we are talking about European parliament? That parliament has only an advisory role in the European Union, and that's why this thing is sometimes left out from the public media. But when we are thinking about the advisory role in the European Union, the salary of that job is really big, the 9000 euros per month is very big money to almost every person in the world, and there would be some other benefits about this job.
This is the thing, what people normally forget when we are talking about the European Union and the role of the parliament in this system. Sometimes political leaders are hiding back of that kind of organizations, and they just accept things, what are made in the European Parliament, appealing that the parliament or European Union has been forcing them to do those decisions, and then they hadn't got any change to say a thing against those persons, who are sitting in European Parliament.
European parliament would get a very high salary
9000 euros per month is big money. That means that there is "lots of people" who want to go to that place. This is the thing, what makes so difficult to make decisions what is concerning this thing because if the MEP (Member of the European Parliament) wants to divorce, that means that this person would lose the 9000 euros salary. This kind of things is really interesting things to think when we are thinking about personal relationships with the European Parliament.
When we are facing populism and so-called easy solutions, we must realize that the relationship with the EU is Complicated than we ever can imagine. When people would get a place in the European Parliament, they forget the thing, what they said during the campaign. And in the modern time, we have new threats, what we must face.
One of them is international global warming, where we must find solutions at the International level. For handling that kind of things, we must have an international forum, where we can discuss that kind of things. Could that forum be the European Parliament or some other actor is the thing? That we or political decision makers must think.
We would need concrete decisions in many things at international level
When we are thinking about the green energy and military systems that hydrogen very suitable fuel for military jets and high power turbines, and that material can produce by using electrolysis in the aircraft carriers. If the hydrogen-powered aircraft would have also oxygen tanks, it can fly higher than any other aircraft in the world.
And what kind of thing that forum could be? Could it some kind of building, or the virtual workspace, what is like some kind of Second Life, where the members of this panel would meet together in the virtual world, where they can share thought together. Or could it be some Facebook group, where those people can write and talk about things?
And in those places, we must make real decisions for handling that kind of things. Maybe we can order things like pollution taxes. In this model, we could determine the pollution frames for each nation, and that means that we can determine the level of pollution for each citizen. That level could be shown as points, and things like owning a car could bring more points to that thing, and if somebody would not own a car, that means that somebody else could buy those free points. But this is the steel wire model about those things.
Nationalism is a big threat for the European Union, and what we must realize when we are talking about European parliament? That parliament has only an advisory role in the European Union, and that's why this thing is sometimes left out from the public media. But when we are thinking about the advisory role in the European Union, the salary of that job is really big, the 9000 euros per month is very big money to almost every person in the world, and there would be some other benefits about this job.
This is the thing, what people normally forget when we are talking about the European Union and the role of the parliament in this system. Sometimes political leaders are hiding back of that kind of organizations, and they just accept things, what are made in the European Parliament, appealing that the parliament or European Union has been forcing them to do those decisions, and then they hadn't got any change to say a thing against those persons, who are sitting in European Parliament.
European parliament would get a very high salary
9000 euros per month is big money. That means that there is "lots of people" who want to go to that place. This is the thing, what makes so difficult to make decisions what is concerning this thing because if the MEP (Member of the European Parliament) wants to divorce, that means that this person would lose the 9000 euros salary. This kind of things is really interesting things to think when we are thinking about personal relationships with the European Parliament.
When we are facing populism and so-called easy solutions, we must realize that the relationship with the EU is Complicated than we ever can imagine. When people would get a place in the European Parliament, they forget the thing, what they said during the campaign. And in the modern time, we have new threats, what we must face.
One of them is international global warming, where we must find solutions at the International level. For handling that kind of things, we must have an international forum, where we can discuss that kind of things. Could that forum be the European Parliament or some other actor is the thing? That we or political decision makers must think.
We would need concrete decisions in many things at international level
And what kind of thing that forum could be? Could it some kind of building, or the virtual workspace, what is like some kind of Second Life, where the members of this panel would meet together in the virtual world, where they can share thought together. Or could it be some Facebook group, where those people can write and talk about things?
And in those places, we must make real decisions for handling that kind of things. Maybe we can order things like pollution taxes. In this model, we could determine the pollution frames for each nation, and that means that we can determine the level of pollution for each citizen. That level could be shown as points, and things like owning a car could bring more points to that thing, and if somebody would not own a car, that means that somebody else could buy those free points. But this is the steel wire model about those things.
Comments
Post a Comment