About the philosophical schools of thoughts
Philosophical schools of thoughts are many times mentioned in the biographies of philosophers. There are found many interesting schools of thoughts, like Neoplatonists, Leipzigeans, Modern German and many more ways to think about things. There is seen many very good ideas, how to put those persons in the boxes, where people can choose, what school of thoughts of philosophy would the philosopher advocate.
And this kind of things are good looking, but if the philosopher self should put self to some of those boxes, that thing would be really difficult. If there would be the allowance to become a philosopher, what depends on the knowledge, what shool advocator the philosopher would be, there would be no philosopher on Earth, who would not have peptic ulcer or who even wrote a single word.
When we are thinking about things like putting people to boxes, that thing would be a nice way to destroy the interest of philosophy in the beginning. Those things like classes of philosophers make studies very hard, and very complicated. And one thing, what people might not understand is that the thing in philosophy is to teach a person to think own thoughts.
Not copy other people thoughts. Even a child can make copies of texts, and in that case, the person must not even understand a thing. I don't speak languages like Japan, but I could copy texts if I can copy marks from one place to another, and I must not understand a thing about that.
Sometimes some people asked me when I started to write, whose thoughts I will write. In those cases, I don't care a thing, what other people thought. But when some person, who knows everything better than I come to ask things like that, they should tell, what that kind of things are meaning to them? Who cares, who have written those words?
When we are thinking about those words, what is the matter, is the writer of the words some Plato from Ancient Greece, or some modern philosopher? When we are thinking the modern philosophy, we can ask, how modern that thing could be Advocators of the modern philosophy shool is mentioned persons like John Locke, who lived in the last 17th century. That thing means that there are only a few changes in the way of thinking in the knowledge theory. Locke lived about 300 years ago, and that man is still very qualified philosopher.
Philosophical schools of thoughts are many times mentioned in the biographies of philosophers. There are found many interesting schools of thoughts, like Neoplatonists, Leipzigeans, Modern German and many more ways to think about things. There is seen many very good ideas, how to put those persons in the boxes, where people can choose, what school of thoughts of philosophy would the philosopher advocate.
And this kind of things are good looking, but if the philosopher self should put self to some of those boxes, that thing would be really difficult. If there would be the allowance to become a philosopher, what depends on the knowledge, what shool advocator the philosopher would be, there would be no philosopher on Earth, who would not have peptic ulcer or who even wrote a single word.
When we are thinking about things like putting people to boxes, that thing would be a nice way to destroy the interest of philosophy in the beginning. Those things like classes of philosophers make studies very hard, and very complicated. And one thing, what people might not understand is that the thing in philosophy is to teach a person to think own thoughts.
Not copy other people thoughts. Even a child can make copies of texts, and in that case, the person must not even understand a thing. I don't speak languages like Japan, but I could copy texts if I can copy marks from one place to another, and I must not understand a thing about that.
Sometimes some people asked me when I started to write, whose thoughts I will write. In those cases, I don't care a thing, what other people thought. But when some person, who knows everything better than I come to ask things like that, they should tell, what that kind of things are meaning to them? Who cares, who have written those words?
When we are thinking about those words, what is the matter, is the writer of the words some Plato from Ancient Greece, or some modern philosopher? When we are thinking the modern philosophy, we can ask, how modern that thing could be Advocators of the modern philosophy shool is mentioned persons like John Locke, who lived in the last 17th century. That thing means that there are only a few changes in the way of thinking in the knowledge theory. Locke lived about 300 years ago, and that man is still very qualified philosopher.
Comments
Post a Comment