The political culture and use of power
The thing is that democracy is a good way to rule the country if the decisions, what government makes are pleasing me, is a good way to think about things. This is the thing, what we must remember when we are talking about the way to rule the nation. If every people in the country supports the leaders, in every state, would have democracy. But why western democracies are supporting dictators?
This is a good question, and the thing is that dictatorial government are a good way to turn attention away from internal politics. If somebody goes worse than in our country, why people should complain? And if people would get too much salary, that thing means, that the production must transfer to some far-east countries, which are also suitable enemies for the western world, because they are far away from us.
Who cares about the conditions, where those people live, because of their national firewall denies the information, what comes from that country. And there are tales that western companies have delivered the firewall technology to those governments for denying the delivering the unpleasing information of the human rights in those countries. What people can't see does not exist is the idea of censorship. And that's why the benefit of some companies might be that people cannot see where those products or their materials are made.
Sooner or later every person in the world must tell the opinions about things like democracy and ruling the nation. This is the thing in every sector of life. Economic leaders must say, do they want to support the political systems, what are against the benefit of the nation and ordinary people.
When we are thinking about the reason, what many rulers have used when they are "forgotten" the next elections is that they are making their nation great. But then somebody would ask, what is the definition for the nation? If normal people are living below the limit of the poor, we must realize that there is something wrong with that state. When we are talking about the regular or average salaries of the state, we must realize that there are two ways to calculate those things.
One is that every salary type in the state would list in the line and that brings the average salary, what is a little bit different than the real economic situation in that nation. This way to make statistics is very impressive, but it is forgotten one thing, and that is how many people would get each class of salary. The thing is that the ruling class, which represents only a couple of percent of citizens can get billions of dollars, and the rest of the people are eating their shoes.
This is a provocative example of the thing, what is called as the growing difference between the incomes. But many times the GNP is mentioned the good method to tell the world, how wealthy the nation or its economy is. That thing tells about how much each nation would earn, and that thing is a really interesting number. When we are thinking about GNP that tells only how much the nation earns per citizen. But it would not tell who will get most of the money, and it would not tell, how much each nation pays to other countries.
This means that most of the national income might come from foreign companies and investors, which seems a very good thing. But then that nation can buy foreign military material and most of the income might go back to foreign hands.
Or otherwise, those states could sell their waterworks to foreign investors and then return all their money to foreign countries. Otherwise, GNP is not telling, who exactly is earning the money of some nations, and that means that the distribution of the incomings is not seen in the statistics, what is always telling about GNP. Another way to tell people is that the economic situation in the state is good is telling, how much or rather a way to say, what is the percent of unemployed people.
That thing is a very good meter about the competitiveness of the companies, which operates in some nation. But the thing, what is missing from those statistics is how many people are in pension, and the thing what would be nice to see is, has that country the way to handle unemployment just to put them in the pension or to works, where they don't get salaries? That thing is a really good way to make statistics looking good. If a person would not get a job, would that inmate send to some"institute" for retraining, and that's a good answer for many problems.
Bad economic situations somehow justify that companies are telling that they must decrease salaries, but the high percentage of unemployed people means that companies have the freedom to select workers freely because there are more offenders for jobs. And that will be a good way to keep people silent, because if somebody talks against the employer, would that mean, that the job of that person would be seen more careful than before.
If we are thinking about the one-party governments, the best thing, what those governments can hope is that people are making 12 hours working days. Too much free time makes possible to agitate against the government and it's a way to rule the nation, and also the long working day will keep people out from social media. That allows companies to deny the delivering information, which is not meant to tell for great public. The thing is that democracy is a good way to rule the country if the decisions, what government makes are pleasing me, is a good way to think about things, as I wrote at the beginning of this text.
The thing is that democracy is a good way to rule the country if the decisions, what government makes are pleasing me, is a good way to think about things. This is the thing, what we must remember when we are talking about the way to rule the nation. If every people in the country supports the leaders, in every state, would have democracy. But why western democracies are supporting dictators?
This is a good question, and the thing is that dictatorial government are a good way to turn attention away from internal politics. If somebody goes worse than in our country, why people should complain? And if people would get too much salary, that thing means, that the production must transfer to some far-east countries, which are also suitable enemies for the western world, because they are far away from us.
Who cares about the conditions, where those people live, because of their national firewall denies the information, what comes from that country. And there are tales that western companies have delivered the firewall technology to those governments for denying the delivering the unpleasing information of the human rights in those countries. What people can't see does not exist is the idea of censorship. And that's why the benefit of some companies might be that people cannot see where those products or their materials are made.
Sooner or later every person in the world must tell the opinions about things like democracy and ruling the nation. This is the thing in every sector of life. Economic leaders must say, do they want to support the political systems, what are against the benefit of the nation and ordinary people.
When we are thinking about the reason, what many rulers have used when they are "forgotten" the next elections is that they are making their nation great. But then somebody would ask, what is the definition for the nation? If normal people are living below the limit of the poor, we must realize that there is something wrong with that state. When we are talking about the regular or average salaries of the state, we must realize that there are two ways to calculate those things.
One is that every salary type in the state would list in the line and that brings the average salary, what is a little bit different than the real economic situation in that nation. This way to make statistics is very impressive, but it is forgotten one thing, and that is how many people would get each class of salary. The thing is that the ruling class, which represents only a couple of percent of citizens can get billions of dollars, and the rest of the people are eating their shoes.
This is a provocative example of the thing, what is called as the growing difference between the incomes. But many times the GNP is mentioned the good method to tell the world, how wealthy the nation or its economy is. That thing tells about how much each nation would earn, and that thing is a really interesting number. When we are thinking about GNP that tells only how much the nation earns per citizen. But it would not tell who will get most of the money, and it would not tell, how much each nation pays to other countries.
This means that most of the national income might come from foreign companies and investors, which seems a very good thing. But then that nation can buy foreign military material and most of the income might go back to foreign hands.
Or otherwise, those states could sell their waterworks to foreign investors and then return all their money to foreign countries. Otherwise, GNP is not telling, who exactly is earning the money of some nations, and that means that the distribution of the incomings is not seen in the statistics, what is always telling about GNP. Another way to tell people is that the economic situation in the state is good is telling, how much or rather a way to say, what is the percent of unemployed people.
That thing is a very good meter about the competitiveness of the companies, which operates in some nation. But the thing, what is missing from those statistics is how many people are in pension, and the thing what would be nice to see is, has that country the way to handle unemployment just to put them in the pension or to works, where they don't get salaries? That thing is a really good way to make statistics looking good. If a person would not get a job, would that inmate send to some"institute" for retraining, and that's a good answer for many problems.
Bad economic situations somehow justify that companies are telling that they must decrease salaries, but the high percentage of unemployed people means that companies have the freedom to select workers freely because there are more offenders for jobs. And that will be a good way to keep people silent, because if somebody talks against the employer, would that mean, that the job of that person would be seen more careful than before.
If we are thinking about the one-party governments, the best thing, what those governments can hope is that people are making 12 hours working days. Too much free time makes possible to agitate against the government and it's a way to rule the nation, and also the long working day will keep people out from social media. That allows companies to deny the delivering information, which is not meant to tell for great public. The thing is that democracy is a good way to rule the country if the decisions, what government makes are pleasing me, is a good way to think about things, as I wrote at the beginning of this text.
Comments
Post a Comment