Working in a remote position would decrease the level of carbon dioxide.
Remote working is sometimes a very difficult thing for some people. That thing would decrease the usage of the public and private transportation, and that would leave the space in cities, but it can also decrease the level of carbon dioxide production. The motivation of denying something tells many things about the lobbers. Many lobbers have told that they selves or some other person, who they know is against public transportation or private automobiles because they have principles or they are believing that they are doing the right thing. But the thing is that there is something, what motivates those persons to support the private automobiles for some reasons
The thing is that we must decrease the use of private vehicles anyway because the room for the automobiles is ending, and that is the biggest problem in the urban environment. But why somebody is telling that mass transportation is against their will or principles? So they just want to show that they are above everything, and they can just leave the chances of the environment without notice.
Or is it so? Are they afraid something, because they don't care about pollution and the changing of climate? If we want to make the city area flexible for transportation, we can just leave home and work by using remote connections, which makes possible to leave the car or every other transportation in history. And of course, that would give change to focus the traffic to the persons, who need the physical existence in their workplaces.
But the remote working would need strength and high morale, and in the real working life is the joke, that the "remote day" is the day, when the worker has a hangover. And this is the thing, what the remote day does not exist. The thing is that this day is reserved to work at home, and that requires trusting. That day is not a thing, what comes for free. And the remote working is the thing, what can decrease the traveling and traffic, but how to make it work properly?
The simple answer is to increase the moral sense of responsibility, and by making this kind of things is how to make those things, that the person works at home by using remote working environments and network-based solutions. That kind of things are used in the modern education system, and maybe they would work in real working life. But the thing is that those things need high moral attitude, that the work is done without the boss is breathing to the neck all day long. The thing in the remote work is that makes a revolution in the working life. And we must be ready for that kind of revolution, which makes the working life more effective and flexible than ever before.
Remote working is sometimes a very difficult thing for some people. That thing would decrease the usage of the public and private transportation, and that would leave the space in cities, but it can also decrease the level of carbon dioxide production. The motivation of denying something tells many things about the lobbers. Many lobbers have told that they selves or some other person, who they know is against public transportation or private automobiles because they have principles or they are believing that they are doing the right thing. But the thing is that there is something, what motivates those persons to support the private automobiles for some reasons
The thing is that we must decrease the use of private vehicles anyway because the room for the automobiles is ending, and that is the biggest problem in the urban environment. But why somebody is telling that mass transportation is against their will or principles? So they just want to show that they are above everything, and they can just leave the chances of the environment without notice.
Or is it so? Are they afraid something, because they don't care about pollution and the changing of climate? If we want to make the city area flexible for transportation, we can just leave home and work by using remote connections, which makes possible to leave the car or every other transportation in history. And of course, that would give change to focus the traffic to the persons, who need the physical existence in their workplaces.
But the remote working would need strength and high morale, and in the real working life is the joke, that the "remote day" is the day, when the worker has a hangover. And this is the thing, what the remote day does not exist. The thing is that this day is reserved to work at home, and that requires trusting. That day is not a thing, what comes for free. And the remote working is the thing, what can decrease the traveling and traffic, but how to make it work properly?
The simple answer is to increase the moral sense of responsibility, and by making this kind of things is how to make those things, that the person works at home by using remote working environments and network-based solutions. That kind of things are used in the modern education system, and maybe they would work in real working life. But the thing is that those things need high moral attitude, that the work is done without the boss is breathing to the neck all day long. The thing in the remote work is that makes a revolution in the working life. And we must be ready for that kind of revolution, which makes the working life more effective and flexible than ever before.
Comments
Post a Comment