The thing what makes the scientist
The scientist always uses the sources and dares to publish things, what are against the political or other prediction. This is one mark for real scientist, that this person dares to make different conclusions, what were predict in the introduction of the investigation problem if the sources show that thing, and the scientist dares to change the opinion, what that person thinks before the research begins.
The thing is that those predictions can be fallen by using sources, but there is one way to make sure, that the research or report would stand the changes in the technological resources, and that is using the term "conclusions of this research", that leaves the door open to the changes, what might cause because the advantage of technology. This is the thing in science. More advanced systems would make the predictions and theories true, but they can also prove them false, and this the thing is, what causes the changes in the study books.
But when we are thinking about the cases, where the scientists have made mistakes, we must realize that the fault could be made a scientist self, or it can make some other person. That means that if the source material is faked in purpose or it would be manipulated by some way, like using Photoshop, that means that the mistake is not made by the scientist self, and the reason for the wrong result in the analysis is because the source material is faked or documented by the wrong way.
On the internet are many pictures of the object, which seems like the blue bubble or some kind of airship. And that picture, what is isolated from one film, what is seen in YouTube has been published as the "UFO" photograph, but if the entire film of this object has been shown, would people notice that the thing was about the explosion of the rocket.
This is a good example of the selective use of sources. The source material is the film, where is taken one frame, and then the thing would seem like UFO. But does it actually look like something else? Could that thing be the HAA (High Altitude Airship)?. This kind of airships are flying extremely high altitude, and they are made by using mylar, the super strong plastic, what was used in ECHO-satellite, what was the balloon, what orbited the Earth.
But the video is seen under this text, and it is the Falcon 9 rocket explosion, and there is nothing mysterious, the object what will fall to the horizon is probably the engine or the cargo, what might be saved by the rescue tower. Or actually, I don't know does Falcon 9 got the rescue tower or rocket, what this device actually is, and sometimes I wonder, why the satellite launching rockets would not have that equipment? In the case of explosion, it would save the satellite for another attempt to launch, and that would save money in the case of an accident. That means that the rescue rocket can use in both, manned and unmanned missions.
And maybe sometimes later, I will write about some UFO-pictures, what might be faked, because they portrayed some secret aircraft. But those images and pictures are a very good thing to write or handle when we are writing about the scientific way to think. That means that there is no evidence before the image have been analyzed, and if it is faked the person, who made that thing just wastes the time of the scholar, who must always make the analyzes about the thing, what would send to their desk. Before investigation and analysis, there is nothing else that thoughts or something like that. After the analysis, we would know something better than before the analysis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axJdNbWYflM
The scientist always uses the sources and dares to publish things, what are against the political or other prediction. This is one mark for real scientist, that this person dares to make different conclusions, what were predict in the introduction of the investigation problem if the sources show that thing, and the scientist dares to change the opinion, what that person thinks before the research begins.
The thing is that those predictions can be fallen by using sources, but there is one way to make sure, that the research or report would stand the changes in the technological resources, and that is using the term "conclusions of this research", that leaves the door open to the changes, what might cause because the advantage of technology. This is the thing in science. More advanced systems would make the predictions and theories true, but they can also prove them false, and this the thing is, what causes the changes in the study books.
But when we are thinking about the cases, where the scientists have made mistakes, we must realize that the fault could be made a scientist self, or it can make some other person. That means that if the source material is faked in purpose or it would be manipulated by some way, like using Photoshop, that means that the mistake is not made by the scientist self, and the reason for the wrong result in the analysis is because the source material is faked or documented by the wrong way.
On the internet are many pictures of the object, which seems like the blue bubble or some kind of airship. And that picture, what is isolated from one film, what is seen in YouTube has been published as the "UFO" photograph, but if the entire film of this object has been shown, would people notice that the thing was about the explosion of the rocket.
This is a good example of the selective use of sources. The source material is the film, where is taken one frame, and then the thing would seem like UFO. But does it actually look like something else? Could that thing be the HAA (High Altitude Airship)?. This kind of airships are flying extremely high altitude, and they are made by using mylar, the super strong plastic, what was used in ECHO-satellite, what was the balloon, what orbited the Earth.
But the video is seen under this text, and it is the Falcon 9 rocket explosion, and there is nothing mysterious, the object what will fall to the horizon is probably the engine or the cargo, what might be saved by the rescue tower. Or actually, I don't know does Falcon 9 got the rescue tower or rocket, what this device actually is, and sometimes I wonder, why the satellite launching rockets would not have that equipment? In the case of explosion, it would save the satellite for another attempt to launch, and that would save money in the case of an accident. That means that the rescue rocket can use in both, manned and unmanned missions.
And maybe sometimes later, I will write about some UFO-pictures, what might be faked, because they portrayed some secret aircraft. But those images and pictures are a very good thing to write or handle when we are writing about the scientific way to think. That means that there is no evidence before the image have been analyzed, and if it is faked the person, who made that thing just wastes the time of the scholar, who must always make the analyzes about the thing, what would send to their desk. Before investigation and analysis, there is nothing else that thoughts or something like that. After the analysis, we would know something better than before the analysis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axJdNbWYflM
Comments
Post a Comment