Skip to main content

How to get scientific evidence about some things?

How to get scientific evidence about some things?


The headline of this text could be "why should I read the text before I give comment for something"?. This is one of the biggest things, what people should think when they are writing something. And the thing, what they should think about things is that there is a difference between opinions and scientific truth.  We might think and believe in something, but we don't have evidence about this object, what we want to believe, and this makes sometimes very difficult to think and write about some things, what we are thinking as the thing, what is called the "truth".

When we are thinking about the truth, we always find people, who are playing some great role in the mind of some people, and that's why we want to give support for their thoughts and support their position. And in this case, I will use the example, that some very big business director believes in the "flat earth theory". Here I must say that believing is proven if that director has membership in the expensive club, what is mentioned as the "flat earth" society, and the purpose of the club is to prove that earth is flat.

This is, of course, so-called pseudoscience and the reason, why I took this question for handling in this text, is that there are many people, who want to please the big bosses. And what if this big boss offers a good job for the first ten persons, who would underwrite some list, where they confess, that they are supporting this kind of ideology. This is the thing, what somebody else would want to use against them in the court of law. Even if we would want that job, we cannot fight against the scientifically proven truth.

Of course, we always can say, that "wise men" have been underwriting that paper, and the reason for underwriting is that they would get the job. But the fact is that the Earth is a ball. or by the way, the Earth is not a ball. It looks like a little bit the pear, but if we want to prove that thing, we must make very sharp measurements, and in fact the Explorer I spacecraft or satellite uncovered that thing. This is the thing, what is called "extremely precise", what is not needed in the normal life. Why the form of the Earth is important? Who needs to know a couple of meters anomalies.

That thing is very important in the satellite navigation system, which needs the extremely sharp clock to define the position of the satellite. Those systems need information about the altitude of the satellite because adjusting the clock in the satellite needs very sharp information about the distance of the navigation-satellite and ground station. The thing is very easy to do, the ground station would send the time signal to a satellite, where it is compared with the time of the satellites own clock.

And the difference between those time marks is the thing, what must be fixed. The satellites need the clock to determine the position and distance together and being sharp that system needs to know exactly, where the ground station is. This kind of systems are very complicated, and the ground stations send the location signals to satellites all the time, but the problem is to determine the precise location of the ground station.

The reason, why the clocks must adjust in simultaneous is that the gravity of Earth is slowing time, and there are differences between the clocks of the ground stations and satellites. And this proved that Einstein's theory of the time slowing because of gravity is true. But this causes problems for the measuring, where is needed the extreme precision.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of