One comment for the Zuckerberg's ideas for the rules of the Internet.
The idea of the controlling so-called "not wanted" content is very good, but when we are thinking about political commercials, there should clearly mention that the homepages and messages, what are involving the links to political campaigns and homepages are clearly marked, that the target of those links is the political homepage. There is a possibility that some political lobbyists are forgetting to tell people that the homepages are involving political material.
The people should understand that the lobbyists are choosing the only the material, which supports their own willings and the purposes and benefits of their own lobby. Scientist uses also the sources, what is not please themselves. Scientists also dare to say that they have made wrong decisions and they have made mistakes, and one mistake, what scientists have made, is that when they gave the recommendation to decrease the releasing of the nitrogen oxides, they forgot the carbon dioxide, what seemed to be harmless.
The thing in carbon dioxide is that it has been harmless until humans started to release billions of tonnes of that gas to the atmosphere by combusting fossil fuel. The natural born carbon dioxide is not dangerous, the thing what makes it dangerous is the huge amount of that gas, what is released in the atmosphere. The huge level of the amount would cause the rise of the temperature because vegetables have not enough time to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
And also when we are looking at the Internet and homepages there should be a warning that some material, what is published in the name of the science is actually very polarized. Even today in the world is people, who believe that things like climate changing are a hoax because they choose only sources, what supports that kind of attitude. Sometimes we are seeing that things like melting one glacier are stopped, and that makes possible to continue the lifestyle like past, and nothing should be done.
When we are looking at political homepages, we should have a chance to see, that the homepage belongs to the political movement, and the logo of the movement or party should be clearly seen. And there should clearly show that the information, what is shared by those homepages is political, also when we are talking about organizations like the United Nations, there should be seen that the homepages, what are kept under its name, are involving data, what is accepted by that organization.
The idea of the controlling so-called "not wanted" content is very good, but when we are thinking about political commercials, there should clearly mention that the homepages and messages, what are involving the links to political campaigns and homepages are clearly marked, that the target of those links is the political homepage. There is a possibility that some political lobbyists are forgetting to tell people that the homepages are involving political material.
The people should understand that the lobbyists are choosing the only the material, which supports their own willings and the purposes and benefits of their own lobby. Scientist uses also the sources, what is not please themselves. Scientists also dare to say that they have made wrong decisions and they have made mistakes, and one mistake, what scientists have made, is that when they gave the recommendation to decrease the releasing of the nitrogen oxides, they forgot the carbon dioxide, what seemed to be harmless.
The thing in carbon dioxide is that it has been harmless until humans started to release billions of tonnes of that gas to the atmosphere by combusting fossil fuel. The natural born carbon dioxide is not dangerous, the thing what makes it dangerous is the huge amount of that gas, what is released in the atmosphere. The huge level of the amount would cause the rise of the temperature because vegetables have not enough time to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
And also when we are looking at the Internet and homepages there should be a warning that some material, what is published in the name of the science is actually very polarized. Even today in the world is people, who believe that things like climate changing are a hoax because they choose only sources, what supports that kind of attitude. Sometimes we are seeing that things like melting one glacier are stopped, and that makes possible to continue the lifestyle like past, and nothing should be done.
When we are looking at political homepages, we should have a chance to see, that the homepage belongs to the political movement, and the logo of the movement or party should be clearly seen. And there should clearly show that the information, what is shared by those homepages is political, also when we are talking about organizations like the United Nations, there should be seen that the homepages, what are kept under its name, are involving data, what is accepted by that organization.
Comments
Post a Comment