Activism and the directive of the copyrights
Sometimes social media uncovers things what people would not want to show to the public audience. One of the examples is that the vegan has eaten the flesh of the fish, and those people are very sharp that they would not eat a thing, what comes from the animals. But social media is a very powerful tool, what might use to uncover many secrets, what people might want to hide from the other people. One of the things is that some politicians and political activists are caught by living against the things, what they are claiming to support.
Also, there are things, where the leading politician have uncovered little secrets, and one of them is those persons have not even administrated their social media accounts, and they have hired people, who have written the things in the social media, what other people are admiring. That kind of things is a little embarrassing. Or those activists would not even have any single opinions, what they are written by themselves.
There is a thing, what we must realize when we are talking about the freedom of speech and other things, and it is that there are people, who will like to shut down entire social media because it will tell people things, what those people would not want to show to the public audience. Those things are actually things like complicated political relationships between activists, politicians and the financial power, which means the supporters of the election campaigns.
The thing is that there are activists, who would have things, what they want to hide, and one of them is that there are rumors, that those people have taken money or some other profits from the producers of food, and that means that some strikes against the fur farms are some way suspicious. There are claiming that some persons, who are portrayed as the leaders of the ALF (Animal Liberation Front) are actually driving by using Mercedes Benz and they are using the activism only as the route to parliament.
That means that those people are agitating underage people to make the strikes in the fur farms, and then they would just use that thing for getting publicity for their political career, and also those people would sometimes have will to inform their entire gang to police because they want to clean their criminal registration. There is big money in food marketing, and it's not the same thing, where the sausage makers buy their flesh for their merchandise, and here I must say that there are rumors, that somebody wants to use the ideology for the animal rights for things like improve political career, and also targeting the food producers to buy their merchandises from another country.
And the ideology of those people is, "nothing that people sees does exist". That means that those people are trying to move the production of the flesh to other countries or remove embarrassing material from the internet, and allow to deny the things, what is not supporting their agenda.
That means that those persons have chosen the only targets, where lives cute animals, and nobody actually says things for supporting the animals like pigs, what are not so cute. The thing in the activism is that the people would want to give justice for animals, and I don't like furs because of the reasons for the animal rights, but why nobody defends the disgusting animals, what is also suffering because of pollution?
This is not a joke, there have not even seen the pictures of pigs or slugs in the demonstrations, and the last ones are taking the nutrient straight by using their skin. There is also claimed, that some animal protectors are avoiding their home villages and that some fur farmers have actually called those animal activists in their farms because that kind of things would include the things, what those activist leaders don't want to show their people. Those demonstrations, which includes texts "ALF" are a very good method to ask weapon carrying license for own safety.
Sometimes social media uncovers things what people would not want to show to the public audience. One of the examples is that the vegan has eaten the flesh of the fish, and those people are very sharp that they would not eat a thing, what comes from the animals. But social media is a very powerful tool, what might use to uncover many secrets, what people might want to hide from the other people. One of the things is that some politicians and political activists are caught by living against the things, what they are claiming to support.
Also, there are things, where the leading politician have uncovered little secrets, and one of them is those persons have not even administrated their social media accounts, and they have hired people, who have written the things in the social media, what other people are admiring. That kind of things is a little embarrassing. Or those activists would not even have any single opinions, what they are written by themselves.
There is a thing, what we must realize when we are talking about the freedom of speech and other things, and it is that there are people, who will like to shut down entire social media because it will tell people things, what those people would not want to show to the public audience. Those things are actually things like complicated political relationships between activists, politicians and the financial power, which means the supporters of the election campaigns.
The thing is that there are activists, who would have things, what they want to hide, and one of them is that there are rumors, that those people have taken money or some other profits from the producers of food, and that means that some strikes against the fur farms are some way suspicious. There are claiming that some persons, who are portrayed as the leaders of the ALF (Animal Liberation Front) are actually driving by using Mercedes Benz and they are using the activism only as the route to parliament.
That means that those people are agitating underage people to make the strikes in the fur farms, and then they would just use that thing for getting publicity for their political career, and also those people would sometimes have will to inform their entire gang to police because they want to clean their criminal registration. There is big money in food marketing, and it's not the same thing, where the sausage makers buy their flesh for their merchandise, and here I must say that there are rumors, that somebody wants to use the ideology for the animal rights for things like improve political career, and also targeting the food producers to buy their merchandises from another country.
And the ideology of those people is, "nothing that people sees does exist". That means that those people are trying to move the production of the flesh to other countries or remove embarrassing material from the internet, and allow to deny the things, what is not supporting their agenda.
That means that those persons have chosen the only targets, where lives cute animals, and nobody actually says things for supporting the animals like pigs, what are not so cute. The thing in the activism is that the people would want to give justice for animals, and I don't like furs because of the reasons for the animal rights, but why nobody defends the disgusting animals, what is also suffering because of pollution?
This is not a joke, there have not even seen the pictures of pigs or slugs in the demonstrations, and the last ones are taking the nutrient straight by using their skin. There is also claimed, that some animal protectors are avoiding their home villages and that some fur farmers have actually called those animal activists in their farms because that kind of things would include the things, what those activist leaders don't want to show their people. Those demonstrations, which includes texts "ALF" are a very good method to ask weapon carrying license for own safety.
Comments
Post a Comment