Google and its complicated relationship with the Internet
Google is the company, which is a very big problem on the Internet, and the thing is that if we would want to make the competitor for it, we must create the indexing algorithms, what are the same time effect, what Google uses, and when we are thinking about search engines, the thing, what makes Google so effective is that it has collected data from the searches over 20 years.
And the thing is that in the databases must be data, what the indexing algorithms would index and sort. This is the problem with Google, which has the ultimate power in the world of the Internet. When we are thinking about media services like YouTube, there is one thing, what makes the competitor hard to get in service. The users must find that new service, and as you might see, the use of social media and media channels is a free willing choice. The thing what makes YouTube so popular is that it is easy to use.
If we would create a new social media or media service, we must have powerful servers, and if we would make that thing ourselves, we should have money and staff for that thing. The moderators should work 24 hours per day every each day of the year. And that thing costs money. The electric bill of the powerful servers must also be paid, and when the user would select the social media service, the question is that those people probably wanted to be seen in the media, so nobody wants to be the only user in the social media service.
When the social media service would collect money it can choose the source for that financial income. It can collect it from the users or somewhere else, and in the western world that somewhere else means actually the marketing offices, who would want to show their commercials for people. The thing is that Google dominates the Internet is a very complicated problem because the channels like YouTube are free and they show the free material if the owners of the channel accept the information, what is delivered by using that channel. And that is the problem with freedom. The thing what makes this information very problematic is that there is no channel, where we can get the information, what is not connecting to Google or YouTube.
The problem is that if Google doesn't like you homepages, they would be removed if the owner is Google, and the domain belongs to Google if it would be free. The texts that are written in there belongs to the writer. If the home pages are under the paid domain, the thing is that Google would not just index that homepage, and that means that nobody finds those homepages. This makes YouTube like the vegetable, which would quell other vegetables around it. The thing is that no competitor has the same kind of material to offer than YouTube, and that brings the users to that thing.
But there are arguments, what makes this kind of things more complicated than we ever can imagine. There are things in YouTube what do not please the politicians and other people because there are things, what they would not want to show people, or what would you like about the priest, who will drink alcohol and slags of the people or acts awry, who should listen to that person?
Those things make YouTube a little bit uncomfortable thing for some people. And the world is changed. In the world of yesterday, we can just call politicians for help. They make laws, and they can deny YouTube, but here we must realize that also the actors like YouTube and Google has money for lobbying the politicians and paying their campaigns.
So if we would like to deny those channels, we must know, that there are politicians, who would be supported by Google. And when we are thinking about the election campaigns, Google can decrease the page rank of the homepages of the politicians who those people would not like. And this makes that kind of laws very difficult to create.
Google is the company, which is a very big problem on the Internet, and the thing is that if we would want to make the competitor for it, we must create the indexing algorithms, what are the same time effect, what Google uses, and when we are thinking about search engines, the thing, what makes Google so effective is that it has collected data from the searches over 20 years.
And the thing is that in the databases must be data, what the indexing algorithms would index and sort. This is the problem with Google, which has the ultimate power in the world of the Internet. When we are thinking about media services like YouTube, there is one thing, what makes the competitor hard to get in service. The users must find that new service, and as you might see, the use of social media and media channels is a free willing choice. The thing what makes YouTube so popular is that it is easy to use.
If we would create a new social media or media service, we must have powerful servers, and if we would make that thing ourselves, we should have money and staff for that thing. The moderators should work 24 hours per day every each day of the year. And that thing costs money. The electric bill of the powerful servers must also be paid, and when the user would select the social media service, the question is that those people probably wanted to be seen in the media, so nobody wants to be the only user in the social media service.
When the social media service would collect money it can choose the source for that financial income. It can collect it from the users or somewhere else, and in the western world that somewhere else means actually the marketing offices, who would want to show their commercials for people. The thing is that Google dominates the Internet is a very complicated problem because the channels like YouTube are free and they show the free material if the owners of the channel accept the information, what is delivered by using that channel. And that is the problem with freedom. The thing what makes this information very problematic is that there is no channel, where we can get the information, what is not connecting to Google or YouTube.
The problem is that if Google doesn't like you homepages, they would be removed if the owner is Google, and the domain belongs to Google if it would be free. The texts that are written in there belongs to the writer. If the home pages are under the paid domain, the thing is that Google would not just index that homepage, and that means that nobody finds those homepages. This makes YouTube like the vegetable, which would quell other vegetables around it. The thing is that no competitor has the same kind of material to offer than YouTube, and that brings the users to that thing.
But there are arguments, what makes this kind of things more complicated than we ever can imagine. There are things in YouTube what do not please the politicians and other people because there are things, what they would not want to show people, or what would you like about the priest, who will drink alcohol and slags of the people or acts awry, who should listen to that person?
Those things make YouTube a little bit uncomfortable thing for some people. And the world is changed. In the world of yesterday, we can just call politicians for help. They make laws, and they can deny YouTube, but here we must realize that also the actors like YouTube and Google has money for lobbying the politicians and paying their campaigns.
So if we would like to deny those channels, we must know, that there are politicians, who would be supported by Google. And when we are thinking about the election campaigns, Google can decrease the page rank of the homepages of the politicians who those people would not like. And this makes that kind of laws very difficult to create.
Comments
Post a Comment