Writing about the politics in the Crimean peninsula and in the world of nuclear forces
The dream of control Crimean peninsula and the traffic in the Black Sea has turned against Russia. The influence of that kind of international acts is that other nations have started to keep Russia as the aggressive and provocative neighbor, and this kind of things are forcing the western nations to go together in military cooperation, and another thing is that the Russian way to talk about their weapons as the strike-equipment, and aggressive way to speak, we must realize that this kind of things are justifying the ABM (Anti Ballistic Missile) bases in East Europe.
Those ABM missiles are meant for the protection the NATO, but actually, many writers forget the thing that the same weapons can use against ground targets, as well they can strike against ballistic missiles. When we are thinking about the missiles like THAAD, what has the kinetic energy warhead, those missiles can give the iron projectiles very high speed, and when the steel ball hits the ground with the speed of 15 000 kilometers per hour, the impact energy would terminate the target.
The metal melts as the drop, which consists the melted steel, and that thing could be very devastating against the point targets. The benefit of the THAAD system is that it would not consist the radioactive material, and that means that if those missiles would go in the hands of terrorists, they can use the fuel in the bombs, but the thing is that the destruction is more limited than the use of the nuclear bomb. So the thing is that THAAD cannot use against its creators.
The developing of those missiles started in the 1980s when the MGM-131 Pershing II missiles wanted to equip with conventional strike capacity. The suitable system for that purpose seemed the iron nails, which would launch against the target. The idea of that weapon was to create the "shotgun-type" system, what can use against enemy airfields and missiles. The system was planned to launch to the opposite direction of the trajectory of the enemy missiles, and the iron projectiles would hit the target with very high speed. That system could be the tactical version of the ballistic missile, which cannot use against its owners. The problem with highly mobilized battlefield systems is that they are good targets for the terrorists, and that's why the military commanders have been searching the replacement options for the highly radioactive isotopes.
The system what was used before THAAD was SPRINT, the ABM system, what was equipped with high yield thermonuclear warhead, what had 5 mt destructive power. The mission of that warhead was to cause the large fireball and powerful EMP pulse, what would damage and vaporize the incoming missiles. But those warheads can be used also against ground troops. The thing was that the nuclear warhead could be dangerous in the wrong hands even if the detonation of the nuclear system would fail, because of the radioactive material would be used in the radioactive bombs. And that's why the military is looking for replacements for those weapons.
When we are talking about the contract, what denies the developing and producing the intermediate range ballistic- and cruise missiles, we must say that the contract does not have an effect if it would just break by every nation, what are involving it. In the real world, the thing is that IRBM missiles and the highly mobile nuclear missile systems need sharp location system if those missiles would be used against hardener silos and other targets.
For the operation, the missile needs two coordinates the beginning coordinate of the flight and the coordinate where to fly. And the GPS would give the first coordinate, where the launcher is, and the second coordinate or the end of the trajectory would come from the intelligence or reconnaissance systems, what are giving the coordinates to the warheads of the missile.
The beginning point of the trajectory is important because that point is used to calculate, how missile must fly to the second point. The GPS is a very effective tool for that purpose because it can give the location to the missile in seconds, and after that, the unit can continue the trip. The entire operation would take only a couple of seconds, and that's why the destroying those missiles would be very difficult, and after the nuclear missiles have flown away, the targets would be destroyed even if the launching vehicles would be destroyed.
And many people think that NATO has more advanced technology in that area than Russia and things like multi-channel communication with packed data packages makes the jamming of that kind of systems very difficult, because of the communication between location satellite and receiving system is happening in very short time periods. Those computerized and highly secured systems are hard to locate because entire communication would be done in a couple of nanoseconds, what is the time for the transmitting the coded data package, that contains the packed and coded location information. And the biometric safety systems makes them useless in the wrong hands. That means if the wrong person takes the device, would the information about that send to the command center.
The dream of control Crimean peninsula and the traffic in the Black Sea has turned against Russia. The influence of that kind of international acts is that other nations have started to keep Russia as the aggressive and provocative neighbor, and this kind of things are forcing the western nations to go together in military cooperation, and another thing is that the Russian way to talk about their weapons as the strike-equipment, and aggressive way to speak, we must realize that this kind of things are justifying the ABM (Anti Ballistic Missile) bases in East Europe.
Those ABM missiles are meant for the protection the NATO, but actually, many writers forget the thing that the same weapons can use against ground targets, as well they can strike against ballistic missiles. When we are thinking about the missiles like THAAD, what has the kinetic energy warhead, those missiles can give the iron projectiles very high speed, and when the steel ball hits the ground with the speed of 15 000 kilometers per hour, the impact energy would terminate the target.
The metal melts as the drop, which consists the melted steel, and that thing could be very devastating against the point targets. The benefit of the THAAD system is that it would not consist the radioactive material, and that means that if those missiles would go in the hands of terrorists, they can use the fuel in the bombs, but the thing is that the destruction is more limited than the use of the nuclear bomb. So the thing is that THAAD cannot use against its creators.
The developing of those missiles started in the 1980s when the MGM-131 Pershing II missiles wanted to equip with conventional strike capacity. The suitable system for that purpose seemed the iron nails, which would launch against the target. The idea of that weapon was to create the "shotgun-type" system, what can use against enemy airfields and missiles. The system was planned to launch to the opposite direction of the trajectory of the enemy missiles, and the iron projectiles would hit the target with very high speed. That system could be the tactical version of the ballistic missile, which cannot use against its owners. The problem with highly mobilized battlefield systems is that they are good targets for the terrorists, and that's why the military commanders have been searching the replacement options for the highly radioactive isotopes.
The system what was used before THAAD was SPRINT, the ABM system, what was equipped with high yield thermonuclear warhead, what had 5 mt destructive power. The mission of that warhead was to cause the large fireball and powerful EMP pulse, what would damage and vaporize the incoming missiles. But those warheads can be used also against ground troops. The thing was that the nuclear warhead could be dangerous in the wrong hands even if the detonation of the nuclear system would fail, because of the radioactive material would be used in the radioactive bombs. And that's why the military is looking for replacements for those weapons.
When we are talking about the contract, what denies the developing and producing the intermediate range ballistic- and cruise missiles, we must say that the contract does not have an effect if it would just break by every nation, what are involving it. In the real world, the thing is that IRBM missiles and the highly mobile nuclear missile systems need sharp location system if those missiles would be used against hardener silos and other targets.
For the operation, the missile needs two coordinates the beginning coordinate of the flight and the coordinate where to fly. And the GPS would give the first coordinate, where the launcher is, and the second coordinate or the end of the trajectory would come from the intelligence or reconnaissance systems, what are giving the coordinates to the warheads of the missile.
The beginning point of the trajectory is important because that point is used to calculate, how missile must fly to the second point. The GPS is a very effective tool for that purpose because it can give the location to the missile in seconds, and after that, the unit can continue the trip. The entire operation would take only a couple of seconds, and that's why the destroying those missiles would be very difficult, and after the nuclear missiles have flown away, the targets would be destroyed even if the launching vehicles would be destroyed.
And many people think that NATO has more advanced technology in that area than Russia and things like multi-channel communication with packed data packages makes the jamming of that kind of systems very difficult, because of the communication between location satellite and receiving system is happening in very short time periods. Those computerized and highly secured systems are hard to locate because entire communication would be done in a couple of nanoseconds, what is the time for the transmitting the coded data package, that contains the packed and coded location information. And the biometric safety systems makes them useless in the wrong hands. That means if the wrong person takes the device, would the information about that send to the command center.
Comments
Post a Comment