When humans are falling, robots are rising.

 When humans are falling, robots are rising.

The robot makers are saying that robots will take jobs from some people. And of course, that thing causes worries. But otherwise, we should think about what kind of jobs robots are taking from us? Are they jobs that are wanted or respected? 

Or would you do those jobs? The thing is that robots are a complicated thing in the environment and business infrastructure. And the fact is that robots are effective operators that can grow productivity to the highest possible levels.

Robots can operate without breaks, and they don't need salaries. And if the company uses only robots for a working process. That means it can make products with the lowest possible price. 

Because robots are not needed salaries or practice they can operate near the delivery area. And the thing is that the robot can make so many stages in work. That is stored in its memory. And those modules can be changed when the company wants. 

So that kind of company can minimize the salary and transport costs. That means it can make products with lower prices and that is a good weapon in competition. And even if the products that robots made, are not sold. The company can turn to make a new product right away. Or if there is a cut in production those robots can take into use immediately when the order is taken. The robots would not make strikes. And the only thing that is against them is that they are taking jobs from people. 

 But the problem is, what the people whose jobs the robots are taking would do? 

The problem is that those people would just get their salary in the form of social aid. But the low salaries in the sectors. Where robots are planned to use are causing that the people who are working in those works are unhappy. In this text, I write about normal working robots, which mission is to replace human workers in boring and low-paid jobs. The advancing robotics needs infrastructure that supports them. 

The infrastructure is, of course, the recharge points and wheel-change service. But the environment is also the thing that is between our ears. Things like attitudes are the things that are also belonging to infrastructure. The attitudes are the things that are making people select the politicians. And politicians are making the laws that are controlling the development of the systems. 

When Elon Musk wants to make more robots and use them for work, that is reserved for migrant workers the idea behind that thought is that there is a couple of things that people should understand. The thing is that when we are building more and more apartment buildings we need more and more cleaners. So where we can take those people? Do the native citizens willing to apply for those jobs? 

Or what kind of people is willing to apply for those jobs anyway? If the natives would not want to do them, there is possible to bring foreign workers to make those works. And when the contract is gone the migrant workers are going home. Then we might ask one very big question: what kind of people come from a foreign country to clean some apartment buildings? 

Or would you tell your children that their place in society is to work as a cleaner because we don't want robots or migrant workers?

Maybe some people must take that kind of job. But what is the price of the force? Do we want employees who are a couple of months in work and then they are gone? When a new applicant is hired, there it takes time to introduce and learn the jobs. And then after four months, the next worker is coming in. Is the work well-done if it is made by some person who has social problems? Or would the people who live in the house feel safe if their cleaners are full of tattoos?

Is the person happy if that worker knows that after a couple of months will wait for the new work application? There is the possibility that in those places was not even promised nothing more than 2-3 months.  But is this the thing that we want? Do we want there a large group of outcast people? 

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/