 |
| . |
Problematic Big Bang Theory
In the beginning, I must say that when we are handling theories, there is a 50-50 possibility that theory is right or wrong. Before Big Bang the time and material were one says the Big Bang theory. And when the Big Bang happened time separated from the material.
The form of the big bang is a mystery. Many people have tried to explain, what that thing is and what happened. In the most modern ideas the black hole started to vaporize, and the vapor, what released to the absolute empty universe is formed tachyons. The hypothetical "faster than light particles". The idea is that in an absolute empty universe the speed of the light was 300 000 000 m/s but then it decreased 299 792 458 m/s. Then the quantum fields closed those tachyons away from the universe.
Most physicists accept the Big Bang Theory, where the material is released to the Universe in the big explosion, but some people are not accepting this theory. And the thing that would make the Big Bang Theory somehow problematic is the question, where the material that released into space came from?
The material came from the giant black hole, and then the next question is where that black hole came? This is one of the biggest problems with the Big Bang Theory. The form of the Big Bang is also some kind of problem. Was it only one big explosion or a series of explosions, where the material of the Universe exploded and collapsed back to the great singularity or black hole?
But what caused the explosion of the Black Hole? Was the object that exploded came from the future? Or did the material that formed our universe came from another universe through the wormhole?
One of the explanation what was given for the explosion of the black hole at the beginning of time is called "mirror gravity theory", which means that gravity starts to push things away. In some theories, the gravity turned to the opposite in that giant singularity. But another explanation is far more fantastic and unbelievable than the gravity turning to opposition or mirror gravity.
If we are thinking of Einstein's Theory of relativity we might find the answer for the origin of that black hole from the effect called "time dilation". Time dilation is directly proportional to the escaping velocity and the speed of the object. When the object reaches the speed of light or the escaping velocity faces that point, the time is stopping. That point is called the "event horizon". But behind the event horizon direction of the time is turning backward. So if we are saying this thing by using straight words, we might say that there is a possibility that the black hole exploded in Big Bang from the future.
But there are many other explanations and one version is that the material came to our universe from the wormhole. The white hole opened in the space and then the material came from some other universe, which might be in some other dimension. Nobel Prized physicists Roger Penrose has explained that the universes are things, that have existed between Big Bangs and Big crashes. So the existence of the universe is the chain, where the material would release and then collapse. But where the material to the first universe came, that is the problem.
So if material to the universe came from the wormhole and another universe we might think that we would pass this problem easily. But then somebody asks, where that another universe gets its material. And then we are back at the beginning point. Where the material is coming from?
If we are thinking of the possibility that the Big Bang was the "white hole" that opened to our universe that thing causes an idea, should we call the "Big Bang" as a big burst or big jet? The idea is that even if the universe begins its existence when the black hole explodes there is a possibility that the black hole sends the "vapor" to the absolute empty universe, where is no material or quantum fields because quantum fields are forming around atoms.
Comments
Post a Comment