The end of the era the beginning of the new era

   

The end of the era the beginning of the new era

This is the writing about theories and mental disorders. And the question is why we are always highlighting the mental orders or negative things of the people? The thing is that the world is full of theories, as I have written before. If we think that the majority is always right, and the opinion of the majority is the thing, what must be satisfied, we can say that there are much more nurses in hospitals than doctors and on the ships is much more seamen than captains. 

So nurses should lead the hospital and seamen should lead the ships, because they have the majority if we think that majority is always right. And maybe we should make the referendums about things like should somebody send to a mental hospital because those people are minority or they do not please us?

And the fact is that we all can make theories. But the theories must be proven, that they become facts, and then the fact must repeat many times that it will become the scientifically proven fact. And that kind of thing takes time. The fact is that we can make levitating trains by using magnets, which are pushing trains upward from the track. So we can make the virtual antigravity by using magnetic fields if we want. This is one thing, that we must remember. 

So if we are making some decisions or theories, we must realize that the thing that is behind those theories is something, that we don't know. We can say that there is a possibility that somewhere is some kind of artificial cosmic megastructure, but we haven't seen that thing before. But all radio signals, what origin is unknown are not coming from the microwave oven even if we want that. 

And why we must waste time thinking about something, that we may ever see? Maybe that thing is something, what we want to find out, and maybe some people are willing to find those things out. So physics is only one science in the group of sciences. In the modern world, the calculations and methodology are turning more advanced, faster, and accurate, that we can calculate things with higher accuracy than ever before. 

Mental disorders and Isaac Newton

Was Isaac Newton a maniac? And if he was a maniac, what that thing has to do with the work of that person? Why people are always highlight the mental disorders and private life of the geniuses? Would we be satisfied if Newton was some kind of schizophrenic who lived all his life at a mental institute? Sometimes I have asked, what is life? 

Is that some life under control in some mental institute where people can eat medicine and live a longer life? So what is the purpose of those people's lives? Is that eating the medicines, and live longer? And is that satisfying life? Is that thing the life, what somebody wants to live? Sit in the chair staring in front of them and wait for the next medical dose? If Newton would put in the mental hospital, would that thing satisfy somebody? 

But also attitudes in society are changing. People must not live as they lived in the time when Isaac Newton lived. Maybe Newton died as a virgin, but that thing has nothing to do with the scientific work, that Newton made. I believe that he has been in bed with a woman at least once. So that means that this man was not probably a virgin in the physical meaning. 

But who knows that thing? I'm not Newton, and I don't know about his relationship with those things. Maybe he raced with that kind of thing. I don't know Isaac Newton, and I haven't asked himself was that man a virgin? But in that era, homosexuality could take the person to hang, and that means that there might be some kind of evidence, that Newton was not gay. But who knows the truth? I don't claim to know Newton at all. 

The fact is that Newton made the base for modern scientific work. He was a genius and geniuses are sometimes very extraordinary people. So that means that those people are sometimes "a little bit difficult".  And we must accept also things like that. If Newton had some problems to make a relationship with other people, that means that he might be somehow autistic or he might have Tourette syndrome. 

And if we are calling those things "mental disorders", Newton might be less harmful than some people, who had an army or state under their command. I know that this thing feels very hard to understand, but we have somehow an idea that we can change everything to what we want. We know that Newton was an extraordinary person, and then we can say that "modern medicines" can change that person to social and "many of us will send him to a mental hospital because that thing makes his life better". Why should Newton satisfy us? Is that because we are just jealous? Or is that because we want to see that everybody is similar to regular people?

If we are saying that the people are not accepting the lifestyle of Newton, we must ask why that kind of people must close away from the eyes of the people? Who is the person, who is taking to the "institute"? 

If we are saying that the benefit of Newton is that he would be closed in the hospital, we might ask who is the person, whose benefit that thing serve? If Newton disturbs people, we must also ask is there some alcoholic, who would also need a cure? So when we are writing or saying about those things, we are forgetting to tell "who is we"? And then the answer is that "ordinary people", "the people who you meet at the streets and pubs have that kind of opinions". 

When we are telling that majority is the people, who the court must follow, we are forgetting one thing. How ordinary profession is the judge? Judge is the person, who sends people to the "institutes", what mission is to change people. Most people are not like Isaac Newton, and that means that we might ask one thing, "why we should send Newton to a mental hospital"? Who is the person, who satisfied that kind of thing?