Planets don't live forever

Planets don't live forever

The lifetime of planets is limited. When their star will explode in the nova or supernova eruption, some of them will just vaporize. But the lifetime of the planet depends on another thing. The magnetic field, what is keeping the cosmic radiation away from the atmosphere or the core of the planet is not forever. The radioactive material that keeps the nucleus of the planet liquid is ending someday.

That thing means the liquid stone that keeps the nucleus of the planet rotating will turn solid. And when the nucleus of the planet will solidify, the magnetic field and atmosphere are lost. That means that the cosmic radiation will hit the surface of the planet and start to cut the molecules of the planet into pieces. So sooner or later the planet will vaporize anyway even the asteroids or meteorites will not destroy it.

The Earth-size rogue planets might be similar to Earth in the past. But then the eruption of their sun has thrown them away from their solar system.

The Earth-size rocky planet, what travels around the galaxy as the rogue planet tells that the massive eruptions are always happening in other solar systems. The Earth-size rocky planets are interesting because their atmosphere might blow away in those cosmic convulsions. In the past, those rogue planets could be like Earth. But then the eruption of the star has blown them away from their orbiter.

The reason why there are no giant gas planets inside the asteroid belts is that the solar wind will blow the gas away from their core. If Earth would orbit at the trajectory of Uranus, this planet would have an extremely bold atmosphere, and it will look like some gas giant. The fact is that if the atmosphere of the planet is bold, that thing will decrease the radiation level that reaches the surface of the planet. And then the decreasing radiation decreases the possibility of photosynthesis.

The gravity field of those planets is very important because the gravity resists the solar wind, and the large planet would have a bolder atmosphere than smaller planets. If the atmosphere is too thin that is not a very good thing Thin atmosphere that allows infrared radiation but also the meteorites hit the surface of the planet. A planet what gravity is weak can also create a bold atmosphere, but the distance of the planet from the sun would be higher. And bold atmosphere closes the radiation away from the surface

https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/how-our-galaxy-will-kill-our-solar-system-in-a-trillion-years-planet-by-planet

https://www.space.com/smallest-rogue-planet-discovery

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogue_planet

Image: https://www.space.com/smallest-rogue-planet-discovery

Comments

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying. Does the AI have feelings? Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans. What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions. In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1). A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true. The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains. Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series. So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog