Artificial intelligence and generalizing things

Artificial intelligence and generalizing things

The machine imagination

The virtual simulation that can create the imagination or abstract thinking for artificial intelligence can be already in here. That ability can give artificial intelligence an ultimate ability which makes it closer to humans than ever before.

The computer might have the ability to make simulated games backward, and that ability can call as "machine imagination". In the generation process of the tactics, the computer uses the data, which collected from the opponent's playing style. And then the computer would play the virtual match against the opponent.

In that case, the computer would play things like chess backward, that the user or opponent of the computer would not see, that the system is creating tactics. But when we are saying that only one man can win the chess program, we can ask how generalize this thing is? How probable is that a human player can win the computer if the only winner is the world champion?

Chess and artificial intelligence

Normally we are saying that the human is still winning artificial intelligence in chess. Or modern artificial intelligence with machine learning mode can always win humans, so that thing is not relevant anymore. But then we must ask how to generalize the proposition that chess is the game, what shows that humanity is better than a machine? Have you ever play chess against a chess program?

It's not very easy, because the computer can calculate the movements of buttons far away in the future, and that thing makes winning even the classic chess program, which has not learned mode very difficult if you are an ordinary person, who would not play chess all the time. And when the power of the computers increased, the chess programs turned more complicated, because the computer can calculate more movements to the future than weak and slow machines.

The difference between the power of the processors was easy to see when the same chess program run by using a base PC, which had 640 kb memory and 086 processor. In that case, many people could win that program, but when the program moved to the 386-based computer that computer could calculate so many movements for the buttons, that most of the people would lose. In the cases where the human met chess program the only man who won the IBM chess program was Garry Gasparov the ultimate world champion of chess.

But is the thing, that only one man can win the artificial intelligence in the chess generalized, that the entire population can win the artificial intelligence? And then Gasparov loses to artificial intelligence. The reason was that machine intelligence had the mode where it collected the data of the game style of Gasparov.

Then the computer played the simulated chess matches against the master, and then it was able to create tactics, which made Gasparov lose. That was open the road to the creation of machine learning. If the computer would use the virtual simulation of the game for creating better tactics we can say that computer has imagination.

How to teach a computer in chess? The key element is to find many types of opponents for artificial intelligence. By using this method, it can get as diverse opponents as possible for creating as diverse as possible tactics.

The computer might have the ability to make simulated games backward, and that ability can call as "machine imagination". In the generation process of the tactics, the computer uses the data, what is collected from the opponent's playing style, and then the computer would play the virtual match against the opponent. For creating perfect tactics the chess computer would need multiple opponents, that it can create diverse versions of the tactics, and that's why the chess-pages are the ultimate tool for collecting data for artificial intelligence, what mission is to win human in that game.

In that case, the computer would play things like chess backward, that the user or opponent of the computer would not see, that the system is creating tactics. But when we are saying that only one man can win the chess program, we can ask how generalize this thing is? How probable is that a human player can win the computer if the only winner is the world champion?

Image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_chess

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

The cyborg lichen can be one of the most exotic visions of what the high-tech civilization might look like.

. The cyborg lichen can be one of the most exotic visions of what the high-tech civilization might look like. Above is the image of the nano-submarine. There is introduced an idea, that this kind of system would equip with living neurons, which makes it like some kind of artificial bug or mosquito. The idea is that the robot can take the nutrient by using the robot tube, which acts like a proboscis. The neurons can get nutrients and the rest of the machine can use small fuel cells or the energy to that system can deliver by using the radio waves. Futurologists are thinking about the ideas, what the hybridization of the neurons and machine would look like? Could the hyper-technical civilization look like the group of midget submarines? Those submarines might take nutrients for the neurons, what is living in them. The purpose of the midget submarines, which might be size less than a couple of millimeters would maximize the survivability of the neurons. One of the most intere...

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog