Skip to main content

Would the FAE (Fuel Air Explosion) be so powerful as nuclear weapons?




Would the FAE (Fuel Air Explosion) be so powerful as nuclear weapons?

1) The energy sources of nuclear weapons are different than conventional weapons, and that makes a comparison of them difficult.

The nuclear weapons are acting a little bit different way than thermobaric explosives. The thing, what makes them hard to compare is that nuclear weapon would get its power from the fission or fusion of the nucleus of atoms, and that weapon is sending the electromagnetic, electron- and ion radiation to the target. The beta-radiation is fast electrons, which are impacting the target, and release their energy to it. That causes that the target is heating to extremely high temperatures. 

The beta-radiation would be fast electrons, and alpha radiation would be the helium ion, but also gamma-ray bursts would cause the horrible situation in the target area because it can destroy the DNA inside the human body. When those things hit structures, that thing would be heathen, and that causes the effect, where the vehicles are melted, and even the short term radiation would transfer high energy levels to the target. 

And if the target is made by metal, that means that more energy would transfer to that than the target would be some less thin material. In the metal, those particles would transfer very much energy to the object, and that causes the extreme heat to that target. 

2) The electron and ion radiation along with high-energy radiation would make nuclear weapons superior to conventional weapons.

And the small-size nuclear weapon, like 0,5 kiloton neutron warhead can cause much more damages than the thermobaric explosion. The thing that is boosting the effect of a nuclear weapon in the nucleus radiation like fast neutrons, what can kill people even the structures seems not damaged. The electromagnetic radiation would destroy electric equipment, and that means that nuclear weapons have more abilities to make damages than FAE. 

The temperature inside the fireball of nuclear weapons is millions or even billions of degrees of celsius. And even smallest size nuclear weapons would form the fireball, what temperature is tens of thousands of degrees of celsius. The full damages, what nuclear weapon causes are depending on the time, what the fireball stands in form. The effect of a nuclear weapon is that the steel and rock around it are starting to vaporize. And the nuclear material, what is used in bombs is really expensive and dangerous. 

3) Pressure wall travels away from the explosives with the speed, what the explosive burns. 

The thing that makes the blast effect of a nuclear weapon is the expanding gas as well with a thermobaric explosion, but the nukes would send the pressure wall far higher speed than FAE, and that thing is called the shockwave. The speed of firefront in explosive determines the blast effect and the speed of the escaping gas. And in a nuclear explosion, the speed of fire is very high, because the nuclear reaction is causing the sound, what is called the shock wave. Also, the rising fireball causes the effect that air is starting to pull in the fireball, which increases the damages. 

The FAE bomb is made for simulations of nuclear detonations. They are really powerful, and the destruction radius between those bombs is sharp, but that weapon doesn't have the electromagnetic radiation for boosting its power. So that's why the nuclear explosions cannot compare with the conventional explosions. The fireballs of nukes are hotter, and the other effects make those things more deadly than any conventional weapon can be. 

Image: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Castle_Romeo.jpg

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Who really was Plato, the great philosopher?

When we are thinking about the great philosopher Plato, we are thinking about the man who established the Academy of Athens. And we might remember that this man was a traveler. He traveled in many places in his life and wrote many texts and books, which still is very respected thoughts about the state and other things. When we are looking at the books or series of books, we are facing the thing, that there were lots of texts. If we want to use criticism we must notice that the model of the ideal state is rising the kings in the very high position, and the thing would flatter the kings. And sometimes I have thought that maybe that famous model of the ideal state is written by somebody else. The thing is that the model, where the philosophers rule the state behind the lines of soldiers could be written for the persons like Justinian, who was really flattered. The thing is that this kind of writings was meant for flatter the rulers, who would not persecute philosophers, even they had d...