Skip to main content

Could dolphins be more intelligent than humans?



Could dolphins be more intelligent than humans?

Is the thing, what is a vision in the mind of Nikola Tesla some kind of innovation in the mind of Thomas Edison and is the name of the vision and innovation imagination, when they are made by children? This is a very good question.  So the thing is how we are describing some words? Is innovation only the product of imagination, what can be refined to the product?

When we are thinking about the intelligence of animals, we always say that things like Elephants are not forgetting. If the environment of the individual is very boring, every kind of change for daily routines are leaving in the mind. But the thing is that the memory is not alone intelligence. Good memory is the key to knowledge because the individual must not find information all the time. Neurons are acting like databases. And that means that learning things would be easier for people, who have a good memory, but the thing, what different human from animals is that humans can create new things.

The creation process in human brains is happening by connecting the databases, and then the databases that are stored to neurons would get the new connections. Creation is just the thing, where databases are creating the new connections autonomously. So if artificial intelligence would connect databases and create new connections between them that makes possible to learn and create new things. But does that kind of computer got real imagination? This is a really good question, because when human is creating something, the brains need data, what it processes. Without data and memory objects the brains cannot create new things.

So is "creation" synonym for "intelligence"? And is a "creative" person synonym for an "intelligent" person?

But can the animal be more intelligent than humans? And at the beginning of this part of the text is how to describe the word "intelligent"? Dolphins have bigger brains than humans, but big brains don't make species intelligent. There are a couple of things, which are also important, and the first thing is the number of neurons and the second thing is the number of axon connections between neurons. If every neuron of the brain has many connections, that makes them effective in the slow data handling, but in the cases, where it is needed to react fast, this kind of thing is ineffective.

Neuron what has multiple connections can do many missions, but the reflective reactions are slower for those neurons, and that's why the organism must have also other neurons, what mission is to react fast. Those neurons that are controlling reflective things have only a few connections, and that's why we can call that thing as the RISC-neurons. They can only one or two skills, but they are doing those skills very effectively.

Things like pocket calculators are very good examples of RISC-systems, which are made for only one purpose. They can calculate very fast if a person is shopping and wants to calculate the price of the shopping, but they have only one purpose, to calculate simple mathematical functions, and here I'm talking about the traditional calculator, what can put in the pocket. The reason why it's a more effective tool than a computer is that there is only plus, minus, multiplication, and division calculations.

But when the calculation would turn more complex, the computers would be more effective, in the case that there is a suitable computer program. RISC systems are not always pocket calculators, and there is finding a massive-size RISC-calculators in the computer centers of the world. The RISC-computer might be some supercomputer, what mission is to solve mathematical problems like finding zero-point of the "Riemann's conjecture".

If the brains of animal are meant for solving one problem, do they want to escape or fight, that means that there is a very limited field, where those animals are operating. The what is important for that kind of thing is that they are "here and now", and not think too much about the future. But if we are transferring this model to the world of modern society, we can ask one important question, "what kind of people are making innovations"?

Are innovative persons some kind of "here and now" people, whose focus is on the mechanical product of something. People who have visions have a real good imagination, and visions are things, that are giving the humans the idea of making something new. In the life of innovation, there are people, who have visions, and then they give the form of that vision, what is given to manufacturers of the product.

The environment of the organism is also very important because if the species must not afraid of beasts, it can sit and think about things, like what is the purpose of life. One of the things, that makes humans different than animals is the imagination. Sometimes I'm asking, what is the difference between vision, innovation, and imagination? At the beginning of this text, I asked a question: "Is the thing, what is a vision in the mind of Nikola Tesla some kind of innovation in the mind of Thomas Edison and is the name of the vision and innovation imagination, when they are made by children?" This is a very interesting question when we are thinking about things like research and how humans created civilizations?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Who really was Plato, the great philosopher?

When we are thinking about the great philosopher Plato, we are thinking about the man who established the Academy of Athens. And we might remember that this man was a traveler. He traveled in many places in his life and wrote many texts and books, which still is very respected thoughts about the state and other things. When we are looking at the books or series of books, we are facing the thing, that there were lots of texts. If we want to use criticism we must notice that the model of the ideal state is rising the kings in the very high position, and the thing would flatter the kings. And sometimes I have thought that maybe that famous model of the ideal state is written by somebody else. The thing is that the model, where the philosophers rule the state behind the lines of soldiers could be written for the persons like Justinian, who was really flattered. The thing is that this kind of writings was meant for flatter the rulers, who would not persecute philosophers, even they had d...