Skip to main content

What is the problem with the weapons control laws in the USA?




The image above: Colt 1878 Double-action model revolver

What is the problem with the weapons control laws in the USA?

In the USA every people have the constitutional right to carry weapons (1), and that thing is from the Civil War when people afraid of the revenge of the Southern Soldiers, who were rejected surrendering when Southern general Lee laid down the weapons, and Confederate ended military actions against the Union. There were soldiers, who made crimes and who were wanted to continue their career as the bandits, who made robberies against houses, banks, and buildings, what seemed promising. And one of the most well-known about those people was Jesse James, who made many bank robberies and murders. 

The reason, why the military weapons like Spencer (2) and Winchester-type(3) magazine rifles and revolvers were allowed to carry also people, who were not working for the government was that the free weapon carrying made the law enforcement easier to operate and hide their identities because if only people, who were allowed to carry guns were officials the Union agents would be uncovered, and the also there was the risk that some sheriffs were the supporters of the Confederate. Also in the cases of massive damages of cities like in the Great Chicago Fire, 1871 (4) and San Francisco earthquake 1906(5), the police and the men of Pinkerton detective agency (6) shot many people, when they attempted to rob or steal merchandise from ruins of the city. 

And the idea of that constitutional addition, what is one of the most well-known things in the constitution of the USA was made for creating the balance of power between southern law enforcement and supporters for the Union. And the reason why this thing is so difficult is that law enforcement is based on the gun and the problem is that the law that makes it possible that every person would be allowed to carry a gun has not adjusted anyway. 

This means that the law, what is made in the time of revolvers, where was six rounds and the rifles, with eight rounds magazine, with separately loaded ammunition is allowing that person can buy assault rifle with a couple of 30 rounds magazines, and automatic pistols where is 20 rounds magazine. I don't know is there some limits to the ammunition capacity, but the real thing is those weapon laws in the USA are complicated things. 

During the Cold War, the Pentagon and other authorities were planned that the civilian-owned weapons would be allowed to defend the nation in the cases of the surprise-attack of the Soviet troops. And also in the cases of massive disasters, the guns were hoped to make possible to keep the riots under the control, and this is the reason, why American first-aid authorities have a large number of anti-personnel rounds like Glaser bullets(7), that they can protect their work during the crises. 








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Thoughts about strong leadership

Thoughts about strong leadership Everybody knows, how the dictators would rise in the power of the nation, and the thing what makes people supporting those persons is that they offer strong leadership as the way to make nation proud. And also they have always the same parroting, the foreigners and other nations have a too strong influence in the country. But what makes those persons like some Robert Mugabe or Kim Jong Un to think that they are only possible leaders, and why people would need them? Why there is nobody else allowed to try to come to the head of the state, or even try to challenge those leaders? If they are so popular as they want people to think or believe, why they don't tolerate any kind of opposition if they are done so good and big actions for their people, that they are celebrated in every home in their country. The thing that would return the morale and spine for the nation is the strong leader, who would put the state back in order and row. The thing is ...

Next-generation nanotechnology can be independent-operating molecule-sized robots.

 Next-generation nanotechnology can be independent-operating molecule-sized robots. "A DNAzyme (red) uses its binding arms to dock at a specific location on an RNA strand (yellow) and then cleaves it at its core. High-resolution, real-time NMR, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance, and Fluorescence Spectroscopy." "As well as Molecular Dynamics Simulations are used to identify the structure. And catalytic mechanisms of the DNAzyme. Credit: HHU/Manuel Etzkorn" (https://scitechdaily.com/dnazymes-how-active-dna-biocatalysts-that-destroy-unwanted-rna-molecules-work/) The active DNA catalysts are the gate to DNA-controlled, independently-operating, molecular-size nanomachines.  The DNAzymes or active DNA biocatalysts are next-generation tools for destroying unwanted RNA. The DNA molecule is one of the tools. That can use for controlling molecular-size machines. DNA is like a chemical computer program. And if the researchers can make synthetic DNA that can make exactly what the...