Skip to main content

Populism and its connection to activism





Populism and its connection to activism

In the beginning, I must say that every politician is somehow populist, and populism is the thing how to get popularity. The methodology is that the populist would ask people, what they want. And then make the political agenda by using that information. The negative populism is that the politician would take the minorities under the negative attention, and the simple solution is growing the strength of the police.

Activists are a good target to populist politicians or populists, that they have a strong common ideology, like protecting some forests. Then the populist can create the political permission package that is created around the ideology or purpose of activists. That means that they are the tool, what populists us when they want votes.

Populism and activism have a strong interaction in society because activists are well visible and colorful people, and for that kind of people is easy to make contact. Also, members of religious movements are activists, and if we want to sell our political agenda and ideology, that kind of person is a good target for promises, because they are people, who are working with the same purpose.

And this makes easy to create the package of political permissions, which is built around the things that are important for those people. The emails of the activists are sometimes really easy to get, and then those people can call discussions. When we are thinking about the populists, the activists are good tools in the hands of those people. The idea is that the populists would make contact with activists, and promise support to them if they are giving their support to those populists.

So the difference between populists and activists is really small, and we must remember that activism is giving the experience to affect people, and self-esteem and trust to own business and ideology. But it can also bring relationships, which are not tolerated in the so-called normal society, and those people can give things like Emails in the hands of the populists, and those people can misuse those things.

The activism is the thing, that brings many people in politics. That means that the demonstrations and other things might make some people willing to take apart in the political movements, and maybe some of them are willing to simmer as the candidate in the political elections. But there are also some people, who are becoming more radical, and some of them transformed into terrorists, which is not tolerated. And there are always people, who are using drugs, and that kind of people are good targets for the far wing actors and dirty players in the political field.

Those marginal people can be used as "agent provocateurs", whose mission is to start to throw Molotov cocktails against police, and that justifies the use of force against those demonstrations. Some "non-democratic" governments use that kind of tactic when the demonstrations against the government would turn embarrassing. And sometimes has been rumored that some military companies are using trained provocateurs in the cases when the other side of demonstrations must be ended.

But the most effective way to close the mouths of people is just taking them Emails, and then open the social media accounts by using those Email-addresses. Then those information operators would start to denigrate the political movement, what they claim to support. In those cases, that kind of person can share the pictures of weapons and men with ski-masks in the name of that movement. Or they can start to provocate other people to attack against the targeted politicians.

This is one reason, why people must always be suspicious if there seems to be something wrong with the people, who are playing the members of some political or other kinds of movement. If those people are looking like different or acting against the official line of the political movement, there is a possibility that the person just plays the member, or the social media account is in the name of some person, who has nothing to do with movement.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Thoughts about strong leadership

Thoughts about strong leadership Everybody knows, how the dictators would rise in the power of the nation, and the thing what makes people supporting those persons is that they offer strong leadership as the way to make nation proud. And also they have always the same parroting, the foreigners and other nations have a too strong influence in the country. But what makes those persons like some Robert Mugabe or Kim Jong Un to think that they are only possible leaders, and why people would need them? Why there is nobody else allowed to try to come to the head of the state, or even try to challenge those leaders? If they are so popular as they want people to think or believe, why they don't tolerate any kind of opposition if they are done so good and big actions for their people, that they are celebrated in every home in their country. The thing that would return the morale and spine for the nation is the strong leader, who would put the state back in order and row. The thing is ...

Next-generation nanotechnology can be independent-operating molecule-sized robots.

 Next-generation nanotechnology can be independent-operating molecule-sized robots. "A DNAzyme (red) uses its binding arms to dock at a specific location on an RNA strand (yellow) and then cleaves it at its core. High-resolution, real-time NMR, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance, and Fluorescence Spectroscopy." "As well as Molecular Dynamics Simulations are used to identify the structure. And catalytic mechanisms of the DNAzyme. Credit: HHU/Manuel Etzkorn" (https://scitechdaily.com/dnazymes-how-active-dna-biocatalysts-that-destroy-unwanted-rna-molecules-work/) The active DNA catalysts are the gate to DNA-controlled, independently-operating, molecular-size nanomachines.  The DNAzymes or active DNA biocatalysts are next-generation tools for destroying unwanted RNA. The DNA molecule is one of the tools. That can use for controlling molecular-size machines. DNA is like a chemical computer program. And if the researchers can make synthetic DNA that can make exactly what the...