Skip to main content

The day, when the Swedish submarine destroyed U.S aircraft carrier.

The day, when the Swedish submarine destroyed U.S aircraft carrier.

How this could happen?

In the submarine simulation, Swedish submarine destroyed one US Nuclear powered aircraft carrier (1). That shows, how deadly weapons submarines still are. The thing that makes those Swedish submarines very effective is that they are specially designed for operating in places like the Baltic Sea and tight archipelago. The small size and effective weapons make those small and very advanced diesel-electric submarines very capable weapons. And they show that technology itself doesn't mean that the other side would be automatically better. The aircraft carriers are large ships, and that means they need a lot of water around them. 

The modern conventional submarines are using a new type of machine, like fuel cells and possible there are at least plans to hydrogen as fuel, and they are really quiet and deadly. The hydrogen would allow the nuclear-powered submarine capacity to give fuel supply for conventional submarines while they are underwater. And new air cleaning systems, what removes carbon dioxide from the exhaust gas are giving the non-nuclear submarines new type of capacities. 

If the submarine is laying on the bottom of the sea silently, and use some passive sensors like TV-cameras and hydrophones to make contact with the target it's very hard to detect, if it would not be stealth. When the target would be driven over it, it can simply shoot the torpedo to the bottom of the biggest ship. This is why submarines are dangerous. The diesel-electric submarines are quiet if they are shutting down the diesel. 

And the systems of the aircraft carriers are meant to detect the nuclear-power submarines, which are quite noisy. The cooling systems that are used with nuclear reactors are keeping noise. The diesel-electric submarines have limited operational capacity than nuclear-powered submarines, but in limited areas like the Baltic Sea, they can be effective. 

But in the modern military world is created the service systems, which can offer support also, when the submarine is at the open seas. That means that submarines can fill their tanks in underwater positions. For the use of that purpose of hydrogen as the fuel of new submarines has been researched. The nuclear-powered submarine could create the fuel to the conventional submarine by using electrolysis. And if those submarines are operating as couples, that would give the ultimate strike capacity to those boats. 

And in that kind of scenario, the conventional or diesel-electric submarines that are supported by the nuclear-powered submarines would slip near hostile coasts, and then they can deliver scuba-divers or launch weapons to the targets what might be the land-structures or ships what are at harbors. 

The diesel-electric submarines like Russian "Kilo" (2) and UKs "Upholder"-class (3) boats can also carry nuclear weapons. That means that those conventional boats have very big strike capacity, and by using the modern cruise missiles and other weapons they are still deadly weapons. 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of