Skip to main content

What was before Big Bang and what the Big Bang might look like?



What was before Big Bang and what the Big Bang might look like?

In the beginning, I must say that in the Big Bang was nothing in the universe. So can we call total emptiness as the "universe", or could we call that thing rather dimension? So the universe before the Big Bang was somehow different than the universe, what we see. Time itself existed. 

Or the physical time, and then the situation was that in the singularity and near it, the time was moving slowly, and far away from the singularity time moves faster than in our universe. This thing happened because the universe was only one gravity point, and that caused the things, that we ever can imagine. If some particle would slip away that singularity, and it goes far away from it, it would elding very fast, and that means it would also flash in a short time after the energy of that particle would be ending. 

So if we are thinking the terminology, we can ask can we call the universe, what was before the Big Bang the "dimensional universe". When we are thinking about the Big Bang as the thing, what came out from its singularity we must realize that this kind of eruptions happens only, when something disturbed the singularity and caused the hugest explosion, whatever happened. 

That thing released material to the dimension and time. And formed the entirety, what is called the universe. 

Because there was nothing, we couldn't notice the direction, where we are moving. But there was something in that darkness and emptiness, and that thing was the singularity, where the universe began, and there was also disorder, what caused the giant eruption, what is known as Big Bang. 

What if we would get our spacecraft to the time, what was before the Big Bang, we can ask a couple of interesting questions. And one is what happens if we would take spacewalk in that universe or dimension?

Would the time moving faster, and we get older in the eyes, and what we can observe in that dimensional universe? Would we just lay in the emptiness, and wait for the Big Bang? 

This is one of the most interesting questions in the world, what was before the Big Bang? The answer is usually that there was nothing, but then we can look this thing a little bit sharper, and say that there was the point, where everything was in small point, what is called one of the greatest singularities in history. And at this point, some person asks the question, where the material has been coming, what was forming the singularity, what caused the forming of the universe? And at this point, we are facing the fact, that we cannot know everything. 

So was the material came from some other dimension or universe? This is the question, where we cannot find the answer yet. The material existed because it was forming the universe, and that thing is the fact. But how there could be material before Big Bang, was that thing be forever? And what is forever? When we are going to the opposite side, the end of the universe, we must understand that this is not the end of either universe or the time. 

When all material has been used in the stars, and every black hole has been vaporized to photon clouds, space, dimension, and energy remain. So the universe still exists, but the form is emptiness, and sometimes the situation, that the universe turns to stable form is the end of the universe. In the universe, what exists now the transformation is an only stable thing. And the end of the universe is that transformation ends. 

The idea is that the material tries to reach balance and the thing, what causes transforming is the energy. The energy is the thing, that is causing that the subatomic particles are going together, and sooner or later, the energy, what shines away from the material, would cause that the connections between the subatomic particles are cutting, and things like protons and neutrons are splitting. 

And when the quarks are turned to super springs the universe is stable. Or is it? When we are thinking about the vaporization of the last black holes, that thing causes the electron waves, which are expanding through the dimension. The electron itself is the prime-particle, which is like quark. And it cannot split into smaller particles, and this is why I rather say "prime-particle" than "subatomic particle" because also protons and neutrons are subatomic particles, but they can split quarks. But otherwise, we can think that only particles, what cannot split into the smaller pieces are superstrings, which are forming electrons and quarks. 

So are "superstrings" the "Atomos", what Greek Philosophers were looking for? 

The answer is "yes and no". When we are thinking about the form of electrons and quarks, we can think that they are like a quantum version of the ball of yarn. In this case in the place of the yarn is superstring, what is created by something, what we cannot even think. And this is the reason, why, researchers are looking for things like "Higgs boson". Those particles are existing in a very short time before they would make contact with other particles. 

When we are thinking about the form of superstring, that thing might have poles. And when it is out from the ball of superstring, the quantum version of the "Vanderwaals-forces" would start to pull the superstring to the shape of the ball. The thing, that this thing means is that the poles of superstrings are pulling each other away from each other. 

So this thing could benefit the theoretical quantum antigravity. In theory, the superstrings can pull the layer upwards, but that thing is hypothetical. The idea is that to layer would drop the superstrings, and then at the bottom of the craft would be the superstrings, what is pulling it upwards. But that thing is only theory, nothing more. 

And finally, what the Big Bang looked like?

The answer would be that thing is looked like some kind of supernova. But the dimension where the material was realized was different. Everywhere was emptiness, and even electrons have not existed. There should not be energy or anything, what disturbs material and energy, what comes from the black hole. 

And the material would be released to total emptiness. But at this point, we are turning to think, where the released material came from? So it came from the singularity, what released it to the dimension, as I wrote earlier. But then we might ask one little question, which caused the eruption, what we are calling the Big Bang?

When we are thinking about the singularity, what existed in the dimension, we must realize that the eruptions ever happen without reason. Something, that was traveling in the dimension caused some kind of eruption, which formed our universe. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of