Skip to main content

Who controls the society?

 


Who controls the society?

The answer to that thing is simple. The person who has been introduced as the leader of society is the leader because people believe that thing. This means that the leader of the society is the person, who is controlling the information. When we are thinking about the freedom of speech and other kinds of things, we are seeing one of the biggest paradoxes in history. The same media that is rising the democratic leaders to the power rises also dictators to power.

But the same thing what create also destroy. The case of Belarus protests the key element is that without media Lukashenko could attack the protesters and force them out from streets. But the question is, what the members of those troops will tell at home? And the media is the thing, what rises the uncomfortable things in front of the people. The thing is without the media the police force could claim that protesters were only "a couple of childish people" who have removed because the law says that thing was right. 

The thing in psychological operations the people of opposition can make blogs in the name of the reporters, who are supporting the president and that thing can cause arresting by OMON. That kind of thing might make the canyon between reporters and the president. 

Press and media were tools, that brought faults in the society in the common knowledge, but that thing was the tool, that brought the power in the hands of the most brutal dictators in history. Social media is the thing, that brought many things in common knowledge, but that tool is also a very good place for cheating people, and that thing makes it different than we have to get used ever before. 

The problem with social media is that we are accepting in our social circle only people who are similar to us. That thing causes that our opinions of the world are turning to polarized, which means that we ever hear things, what do not please us. So there is more information than ever before, but we must find the information ourselves. And who would like to read things, what is not pleasing us? When we are returning to the beginning of this text, there is a rising one very big question. 

How many presidents have been elected by the media? That means the press just told people that somebody won the elections, even nobody has ever given the vote for that candidate? And here we are facing the power of media. The thing that media is a powerful weapon has faced even the most absolute leaders in the world. What if Lukashenko will order tanks to smash the protesters? What that thing will look like on TV? What those tank men will tell at home about that thing? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of