Schrödinger's cat part II

   

Schrödinger's cat part II

So let's return to think about the problem or paradox of the Schrödinger's cat, what is existing in many layers or spaces at the same time. We know that the cat can have other layers or dimensions than just being dead or alive. A cat can be scary. The cat can be glad or it can scream. Or it can be quiet. The cat can be awake or it can sleep. It can be lost its hair, but it's still the same cat. Or rather saying, it can be a scary cat, sphinx cat, or screaming cat. But basically, it's the same cat all the time. 

If we would use too much force to wake the cat or we use the wrong kind of method, like snapping our cat to balls, the results would be terrifying. So what is the base layer of the cat, that is the question? Is sleeping cat in its base layer, where it uses the minimum energy, or is the base layer something else than the minimum energy layer? 

That means that the cat has many other dimensions than the base dimension or the layer. So what is the thing with the cat? It will always return to its base layer. But what is the base layer or space of the cat? This is one of the biggest questions in quantum physics. The cat is the particle and if we want to use the thing, where we must operate with the minimum energy layers, we must find out, what is the base layer of the particle. 

Complex numbers and the extra dimensions of the number can also be used to stimulate the position or layers of the quantum particle. 

Image: There are needed two axials to show precisely the place of the complex number, which has one imaginary layer. 

Showing the position of the simple complex number 4+4i requires two axials in the coordinate system. The precise point of the complex number is 4,4. The first number shows the place in the traditional number line or rather saying X-axial. And the last number has taken from the Y-axial, what is the imaginal axial. 

The complex number would have an extra-layer or dimension, which is the imaginary part of the number. And the number of those imaginary layers is unlimited. That means that if there are a thousand imaginary parts, showing the exact place of the number in the coordinate system requires 1000 axials and coordinates. 

So if we would take this thing under the observation by using our old friend: complex numbers? When we see examples of the complex numbers they are in the form 4+4i (or 2+7i, etc.). The imaginary part is the thing that makes those numbers different than "normal numbers". They have the extra dimension, which is called an imaginary layer. 

The thing is that the complex numbers might have unlimited imaginary parts, which means that they can be in form 4+3i+5Ai+3Bi. If we are thinking that the normal imaginary number requires two axials that we can tell the precise value of that number the complex number 4+3i+5Ai+3Bi requires four axials to show the point of the number precisely. And if there are more imaginary layers that thing requires more axials. 

Maybe you know why I would not draw the coordinate system, where is five axials. The making that kind of coordinate system is impossible or to say the least difficult, because if we want to increase only the Z-axial in the coordinate system that means that the system would turd 3D. And making that thing requires a holographic system because the modeling of 3D structures in the layer is impossible.