The new paradox that Casts Doubt on a Pillar of Reality

 

"Even clouds are thinking"

The new paradox that Casts Doubt on a Pillar of Reality

So if something happens, if we cannot see it, does that make the thing nonexistent? Or is the thing, what has not happened before thing, what would ever happen? Or if somebody tells us about that thing, and we all hear that story, do we all understand that thing in the same way? 

The thing in this paradox is does something happen if we cannot see the case itself? Or does the special case happen that way, what the most of the cases like that one happen? Let's take an example of a tree, which falls in the forest. Does this particular tree fall because of wind what has an unusually powerful whirl? Or does somebody fall the tree in purpose? 

Of course, most of the trees are falling because of natural reasons, but does this only one particular tree fall because of wind. There is a possibility that the GRB (Gamma-Ray Burst) can also fall the tree or the small black hole can cause the effect, where the tree is fallen, but in most cases, the reason is the wind some kind of landslide. And there is no reported case that the GRBs or black holes are fallen any trees, but the first time would be the first case when this thing happens. But this is only the philosophical text. 

When the tree falls in the forest, and nobody sees that thing does it keep sound? The answer is that maybe it keeps, but there is a possibility that the layer, where it falls is so soft that it would not keep loud sound. 

The thing is that we know that the falling tree is keeping sound, but we don't observe it. This is one of the greatest paradoxes in history. And another form of that paradox is that when we are in the forest and find the fallen tree we know that tree has been fallen. Or does somebody put it in there? The thing is that somebody might put that thing on there, by using some kind of airship, etc. 

But the thing is that we have the right to believe that the tree is fallen for natural reasons like wind, what might fall that tree. But the question is about the thing, what we cannot observe. The thing that happens all the time, but we ever see that thing, because that thing happens too far. Or the effect of the case is otherwise too weak to observe nonexistent. This is a great thing to think about for the day. 

Article about this topic: https://www.sciencealert.com/a-new-quantum-paradox-throws-the-foundations-of-observed-reality-into-question

--------------

Enrico Fermi and chocolate cake

Can we expect that somebody knows everything?

The thing is that we all have different backgrounds, so we all understand things from a different angle. Let's take one example: If we meet Enrico Fermi, one of the most brilliant minds in nuclear physics, the man who created the first nuclear reactor and wrote so-called Fermi's paradox, we might ask that person about nuclear reactors and other kinds of things. 

And Fermi probably tells us many things about those things. So Fermi is a really wise and intelligent man, but then we can ask Fermi "what is the chocolate cake in Chinese?". If Fermi doesn't know that word, would that thing make him stupid? The thing is that Fermi probably asks us to take the Chinese dictionary and look at that thing ourselves. But the fact is that this kind of thing is so-called acting divalike. 

So does the thing that Fermi doesn't know or remember the word chocolate cake in Chinese thing, what we can run to tell the bartender in a local pub? Of course, we can run to that pub and say that Enrico Fermi, the great nuclear scientist didn't know, what is the chocolate cake in Chinse, and probably Fermi sees that thing in the newspaper of the morning. That news tells that Enrico Fermi doesn't know the word chocolate cake in Chinese. But honestly, we cannot expect that even the most brilliant minds in history order chocolate cake in Chinese every day. 

Biography of Enrico Fermi: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Fermi

--------------------------------