Skip to main content

The fuzzy logic

   



The fuzzy logic

Robots are operating by comparing pixels are collected from the cameras with images that are stored in its memory. And images that are collected from the streets might be different from the images, that stored in the database. If the A.I based computer uses the traditional programs and the same accuracy with the normal computer the error between the real world and the image that is stored in the database can cause that the program is jammed. 

So that means that the computers must have certain inaccuracies in their operations. That inaccuracy is called fuzzy-logic, and the idea of that thing is that any image cannot match with 100 % accuracy. This means that the lower match ratio can be accepted. And if the match ratio is about 70-80% those images can be translated to portrait the same object. 

The computer knows that there should be a cross on the building, and then it would use the GPS and other sensors to travel to near the destiny, and then it starts to search the notes of the buildings, when the computer finds the house, where is the certain note, it would go near, and then it starts to compile the words, what should match with the receiver. And then the receiver can receive the package, and then the robot takes the receipt from the mobile telephone, that the mission is done. 

When the robot is looking for destiny it uses the image of the place, where it should go. That place might be something like the house, where it should take a package. It compares the image, what comes from its sensors with the image, what is stored in its memory.  But the problem is that the house might look different, what it is in the picture. Somebody might paint the graphite on the wall, which makes the difference between image and reality. In this case, the computer must use the thing, which is called fuzzy logic. The fuzzy logic bases the way the computer sees things, and in the real-life computer uses CCD- (pixel cameras) for taking data from its environment. That date is comparing with the image, what is stored in the database. 

And there might be differences all the time. The robot might close the target from a different angle, where the image is taken, and that's why there must be some kind of error level, which notes this kind of difference. So the fuzzy logic compares with pixels and the images that are coming from the sensors. And the certain percent of the matching pixels are making the image acceptable, and the robot would start to travel to its target. 

Fuzzy logic bases that a certain percent of pixels are matching with the image. So every pixel must not have a match, because the target might be looking different like it might have a different color. Or the name that is listed on the plague might be dirty. In that case, the robot could clean the sing, which means it can just swipe it by using gloves, and the robot continues until the camera is separating letters. 

If we want to create a robot, which can operate independently on the street, we must create a new way to process data. The problem with traditional programming is that the program is sharp with the input, and that thing is seen when we are setting the password for our user accounts. The computer makes differences between capital letters and minuscules, and we all are seen that thing when we are pressing the "shift" key accidentally in the wrong place. That causes that we must reset the password, and make the new one. 

The reason for that sharpness is the ASCII-code between capital letters and minuscules are different. So why a normal computer program is not so sharp with capital letters and minuscules? The thing is that normally programmers are making two input lines, which means that the capital letters and minuscules have both the own variable, which inputs data to the right point of the programming code. But the thing is that if we want to make the robot what operates independently on the streets, we must use the thing, what is called "Fuzzy logic". By using that type of programming architecture the robot can follow the order, "take the package to the church of Harlem"

If the robot operates independently that thing requires the data, what the location looks like, and then it must know how to go to that place. In this case, the system would search churches from the internet, and then the system can find the image, what is storing in its database. The reason why I use the church as an example is that the cross is a good note for those buildings. 

The computer knows that there should be a cross on the building, and then it would use the GPS and other sensors to travel to near the destiny, and then it starts to search the notes of the buildings, when the computer finds the house, where is the certain note, it would go near, and then it starts to compile the words, what should match with the receiver. And then the receiver can receive the package, and then the robot takes the receipt from the mobile telephone, that the mission is done. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of