Speed of the light is not (and it is at the same time) the same thing with the speed of the photons

Speed of the light is not (and it is at the same time) the same thing with the speed of the photons

The thing that the time dilation causes is that the speed of the photon is not stable but the speed of the light is always stable at the same time. The thing is that gravity would slow the photons but it always slows the time, and that means that the speed of the light is always 299 792 458 m/s. That speed is the fastest possible speed to reach in the straight universe.

So the photon would travel slower than we are walking if the gravity field behind it is strong enough. The time dilation would cause that if we would try to make the race with those photons we would not reach them, and we would meter their speed to the 299 792 458 m/s if we would be in that gravity field.

So what would be first, what drops in the black hole, photon, piece of iron, or the brick? The answer is that gravity would affect all particles in the same way. But there is one rule the escaping velocity must be higher than the speed of light that the photon could drop in the black hole.

And the point where the photon drops in the black hole is called "event horizon". That means that the particle drops through this point speed that is higher than the speed of the light, but does it ever come back? Does the black hole grow until it would form the wormhole with another black hole? Or would every black hole grow until they are eating the entire galaxy?

The speed of light is stable, but the speed of photons is chancing and the time dilation causes that the speed of the light is stable. We know that there are differences in the speeds of photons, but we cannot observe them. The speed of the light is always stable because the gravity would dilate time in the space near the photons.

But before we would see the difference between the speed of photons requires we would step away from our dimension. The reason why I just wrote that the speed of the light is not stable is that it depends on gravity, what effects to photons, what is traveling outside the center of gravity.

But why the speed of the light is still stable if we are looking at the thing in the same dimension is that the gravity dilates the time, and the time would go slower in the strong gravity field. So if the supermassive object would be close enough, that thing would slow the photons, but it also slows the time. And that means that we always would see that the speed of the light is stable.

Comments

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying. Does the AI have feelings? Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans. What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions. In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1). A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true. The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains. Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series. So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog