Skip to main content

The observer cannot change reality.

  


.



The observer cannot change reality. 

In real life, we should separate the observer and reality from each other. The observer is the creature, what is looking at the object, what can be an item, but it can be a reaction, etc. And the actor is the person or some other creature, what is affecting reality. So people make many times error about the observer and actor of the thing, what are the different things. 

The reality is independent of the observer, which means that reality itself would not change, even if the observer sees things changing. Let's take one example. We are looking at the house at different times in the day. At first, we are seeing the house in the daylight. We are seeing bright colors and everything seems clear and nice and when the sun is set, we are seeing the shadows are falling over the walls and below the eaves, the wall seems like black. We are looking at the house, which seems to change to darker. But then we must realize that the house itself is stable. 

The environment of it is similar to what it was in daylight except for one thing. There is less visible radiation. And the weather is colder, so the energy layer of the environment is decreasing. But the fact is that there is no way, how the observer can change the environment itself. The way how the observer sees the reality is changing, but the reality itself is always similar. 

Let's take another example of this case. People are sitting around things like Chess-horse. Chess-horse is the only chess button that is asymmetrical, and they are looking at that button. They are seeing the chess-horse from different angles, and if they cannot move around the table, they are seeing a different-looking button. But if they would be allowed to walk around the table, they might understand that the chess-horse is always the same. 

But if those people are not allowed to walk around the table or touch the chess-horse, and they are looking at it from one point they are describing different shape objects. That is the thing about reality. We all see reality differently because we have a different angle for reality, and this is the thing, why we must realize that the observer and reality are different, independent things. 

The thing that the observer sees is the virtual image that forms in the brains after it is traveled in the neural network. During that journey, the human mind has connected those things with memories and feelings, so when we are seeing something, we should say that we are seeing projection. We see everything differently because we are connecting the experiences and expectations to the thing, what we are calling "observation". 


Image: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/Chess_piece_-_White_knight.JPG

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of