The computer-made image of Loch-Ness monster |
Lake monsters, singularities, and time travelers
Is the Loch-Ness monster (1) some kind of phenomenon rather than an animal? Or is it some kind of hoax? And if it is a hoax, why that story is told to people? There is no single bone or teeth, which is proving the existence of that mysterious monster. And many photographs about that monster have proven to a hoax. What is causing suspicious about systematically made hoaxes, what are meant for covering something that might be UFO-base, underwater technology development, genetic engineering, secret Anaconda farm, or taking prices of the houses low? So nobody knows what the Loch-Ness monster is? Is it a hoax or true remains a mystery? Is it some giant eel, or is it some kind of sea snail?
Could the Loch-Ness monster be some kind of singularity or the projection from other dimensions or the past? If we are thinking possibility, that in that lake is forming the quantum black hole what transports light from the past that thing could explain why there is no observation about the monster itself except the mysterious photographs. The thing, that there are no remainings of the monster is making the Loch-Ness monster interesting.
But the other explanation is that the Loch-Ness monster could be the hybridization of the snake and salmon or the escaped Anaconda or maybe the story is a hoax. Maybe that hoax is written because somebody wants to hide the technical advances of the submarines, and maybe Royal Navy is testing new submarine technology at that lake.
Could the singularity and extremely small black hole, what blinks in seconds explain some monsters? In this time I mean the monster, what looks like some Plesiosauria(2), not squid-looking monsters like Colossal Squids(3). The long neck of the monsters could be the singularity, which raises the water. The question about the lake and sea monsters is, why nobody has seen the cadavers of those animals? At this time, we are talking about mysterious characters, what is looking like some dinosaurs, and real lake monsters are looking like Plesiosauria, and the Squid-looking creatures are not even mentioned to live in the lakes.
Or is the thing why there is not a single bone left about the lake monsters the reason for the monsters has a soft body. That means that the body of those monsters would be like the body of Squid, and that means they might be the chordate(4). In that case, there would not be remainings about those creatures that existed for a long time on those lakes. Or those monsters could be a hoax, what purpose is to low the price of the houses or hide the secret underwater technology.
(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loch_Ness_Monster
(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plesiosauria
(3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_squid
(4) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chordate
Image: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-loch-ness-monster-all-scientists-can-find-are-eels-wgp3tmcs8
Don't take this so seriously.
An interesting tale, why time traveler didn't deny the assassination of JFK
When we are thinking about time travel we must realize, that we could probably affect to single thing. But we cannot affect large scale things, and that means that we could save Albert Einstein from the run over, but we cannot deny the bankruptcy and financial crises of Wall Street. So why time travelers didn't deny the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy?
This interesting dilemma or story has been introduced in some books, what name I have forgotten a long time ago. This interesting story goes like this: the time traveler tried to stop the assassin, but went to the wrong place. The time traveler would think that the shooter operated from grass hill, but the real shooter shot from the window of the book storage. So the time traveler was the victim of the conspiracy theory. This is one of the most interesting tales about the time loop.
Comments
Post a Comment