Skip to main content

Lake monsters, singularities, and time travelers


The computer-made image of 
Loch-Ness monster


Lake monsters, singularities, and time travelers


Is the Loch-Ness monster (1) some kind of phenomenon rather than an animal? Or is it some kind of hoax? And if it is a hoax, why that story is told to people? There is no single bone or teeth, which is proving the existence of that mysterious monster. And many photographs about that monster have proven to a hoax. What is causing suspicious about systematically made hoaxes, what are meant for covering something that might be UFO-base, underwater technology development, genetic engineering, secret Anaconda farm, or taking prices of the houses low? So nobody knows what the Loch-Ness monster is? Is it a hoax or true remains a mystery? Is it some giant eel, or is it some kind of sea snail?


Could the Loch-Ness monster be some kind of singularity or the projection from other dimensions or the past? If we are thinking possibility, that in that lake is forming the quantum black hole what transports light from the past that thing could explain why there is no observation about the monster itself except the mysterious photographs. The thing, that there are no remainings of the monster is making the Loch-Ness monster interesting.  


But the other explanation is that the Loch-Ness monster could be the hybridization of the snake and salmon or the escaped Anaconda or maybe the story is a hoax. Maybe that hoax is written because somebody wants to hide the technical advances of the submarines, and maybe Royal Navy is testing new submarine technology at that lake. 


Could the singularity and extremely small black hole, what blinks in seconds explain some monsters? In this time I mean the monster, what looks like some Plesiosauria(2), not squid-looking monsters like Colossal Squids(3). The long neck of the monsters could be the singularity, which raises the water. The question about the lake and sea monsters is, why nobody has seen the cadavers of those animals? At this time, we are talking about mysterious characters, what is looking like some dinosaurs, and real lake monsters are looking like Plesiosauria, and the Squid-looking creatures are not even mentioned to live in the lakes. 


Or is the thing why there is not a single bone left about the lake monsters the reason for the monsters has a soft body. That means that the body of those monsters would be like the body of Squid, and that means they might be the chordate(4). In that case, there would not be remainings about those creatures that existed for a long time on those lakes. Or those monsters could be a hoax, what purpose is to low the price of the houses or hide the secret underwater technology. 


(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loch_Ness_Monster


(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plesiosauria


(3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_squid


(4) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chordate


Image: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/the-loch-ness-monster-all-scientists-can-find-are-eels-wgp3tmcs8


Don't take this so seriously. 


An interesting tale, why time traveler didn't deny the assassination of JFK

When we are thinking about time travel we must realize, that we could probably affect to single thing. But we cannot affect large scale things, and that means that we could save Albert Einstein from the run over, but we cannot deny the bankruptcy and financial crises of Wall Street. So why time travelers didn't deny the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy? 

This interesting dilemma or story has been introduced in some books, what name I have forgotten a long time ago. This interesting story goes like this: the time traveler tried to stop the assassin, but went to the wrong place. The time traveler would think that the shooter operated from grass hill, but the real shooter shot from the window of the book storage. So the time traveler was the victim of the conspiracy theory. This is one of the most interesting tales about the time loop. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of