Skip to main content

If a tree falls in the forest, and we don't hear it, does it happen?

 

.


If a tree falls in the forest, and we don't hear it, does it happen?


The quantum paradox is interesting. If a tree falls in the forest, and we don't hear it, does it happen? The answer is interesting, maybe maybe not. The thing is that things that are happening without we see them have not existed for us, but they have still existed. The question is how we would know or prove that those things exist? 

We can know many things, but how to prove those things to others is the main problem. So what if a tree falls, but nobody hears that? Or we are only persons, who are hearing that thing? How we prove that thing to others?

The fact about this paradox is that there is nothing that proves things to others. And the tree what falls far away forest but we don't see it is one version of the problem, how the observer has nothing to do with the event itself, but the senses and sensors of the observer affect things, what that person or character sees or hears. 

Let's take another very good example of the polarization of the cases, what is depending on the observer's ability to make the observations. In this example, the astronomer would have the most powerful telescope in use, and that person sees something unique and extraordinary by using that equipment.

The problem that the observation happens in the outer limit of that equipment, and this is the reason, why other astronomers can ever confirm this event. So what that kind of things are teaching us? Maybe we should make powerful telescopes in pairs, that some other person can confirm the observation. 

When we are thinking about cases, that the observer sees something ordinary differently than others, we must only think about the forest in autumn. We see many colors, but the fact is that we don't know does the red-green color blind person sees those forests and leaves in the same way that I or some other person sees those things? 

Or how do you know am I some color blind person? We all know that forests are colorful in autumn, but then we must realize that only hardwoods are dropping their leaves and only leaves are turning yellow. Conifers are staying green all around the year. So all forests and trees are not turning colorful in autumn. And that is one version about cases where accuracy is important in the presentations. 


https://www.livescience.com/quantum-paradox-throws-doubt-on-observed-reality.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of