Skip to main content

Accuracy in terms is important

   




Accuracy in terms is important 

The role of the observer is passive. That creature doesn't affect things that happen in front of the observer. So could stone be the observer? 

Observation means that we are looking at something but we don't affect that thing. We can look at things like black holes and supergiants like Aldebaran. But we cannot affect their actions. We can take a telescope and look at every target, which is marked in the star maps and catalogs. 

We cannot affect their actions. So the observer is passive and does nothing that will affect to affect the thing, what happens in the front of that person or some other creature. But there is one question, and that is could a thing like a stone be an observer? Stone is a non-living creature, which would have no thoughts, and it can stay passively in the place. But can we call that thing as an observer, or should an observer understand what it sees? That is a good question. 


------------------------------


Series of action:


1) Actor the creature what makes something


2) Action what the person does


3) Reaction is how the action affects the object of the action


---------------------------------


The actor has an active role in the action.

The actor will change things, what is happening in front of that creature. The observer is not the same thing, as an actor. The observer can transform to the actor by taking the active role in some cases, but the observer and actor are not synonyms.

The reason why I wrote the word "creature" here is that the actor could be a thing like stone, what rolls down from the hill, and hit to other stones. That means the actor is not mean living creature, and things like stones can be actors. The actor doesn't necessarily understand things, what it makes. And that means the actor can be the thing like the bite of stone. The actor is the opposite version of the observer, and in this case, the stone does something. 

Acting means things like we are kicking a football. That means that the actor is the person who affects something. So the kicker of the football is the actor. The reaction is re-action. The result of a successful kick to the ball is starting to move. 

And the reaction is the thing that happens after the action. So reaction, in this case, is that the kick transfers the action to the football. And that moves on the ground or through the air. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of