Skip to main content

Accuracy in terms is important

   




Accuracy in terms is important 

The role of the observer is passive. That creature doesn't affect things that happen in front of the observer. So could stone be the observer? 

Observation means that we are looking at something but we don't affect that thing. We can look at things like black holes and supergiants like Aldebaran. But we cannot affect their actions. We can take a telescope and look at every target, which is marked in the star maps and catalogs. 

We cannot affect their actions. So the observer is passive and does nothing that will affect to affect the thing, what happens in the front of that person or some other creature. But there is one question, and that is could a thing like a stone be an observer? Stone is a non-living creature, which would have no thoughts, and it can stay passively in the place. But can we call that thing as an observer, or should an observer understand what it sees? That is a good question. 


------------------------------


Series of action:


1) Actor the creature what makes something


2) Action what the person does


3) Reaction is how the action affects the object of the action


---------------------------------


The actor has an active role in the action.

The actor will change things, what is happening in front of that creature. The observer is not the same thing, as an actor. The observer can transform to the actor by taking the active role in some cases, but the observer and actor are not synonyms.

The reason why I wrote the word "creature" here is that the actor could be a thing like stone, what rolls down from the hill, and hit to other stones. That means the actor is not mean living creature, and things like stones can be actors. The actor doesn't necessarily understand things, what it makes. And that means the actor can be the thing like the bite of stone. The actor is the opposite version of the observer, and in this case, the stone does something. 

Acting means things like we are kicking a football. That means that the actor is the person who affects something. So the kicker of the football is the actor. The reaction is re-action. The result of a successful kick to the ball is starting to move. 

And the reaction is the thing that happens after the action. So reaction, in this case, is that the kick transfers the action to the football. And that moves on the ground or through the air. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

The story of (Northrop?) TR3A "Black Manta"

    Image I The story of (Northrop?) TR3A "Black Manta" Sometimes there have been discussions that the mysterious TR3A "Black Manta" was a study project for the B-2 bomber.  That means that TR3A was used as the flying mockup for testing the aerodynamic and control solutions for the B-2 "Spirit" bomber. The thing that supports this thing is that the manufacturer of both planes is Northrop corporation.  Along with "Aurora" was flying one other mysterious aircraft, TR3A "Black Manta". The system is described as the "Stealth VTOL" (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) aircraft. Unless the mysterious TR3B, the Northrop TR3A is the conventional VTOL-aircraft, what is using regular jet engines, but what has the stealth-body.  Image II The thing is that the stealth-reconnaissance aircraft, which uses a similar technology with the Northrop B-2 bomber would be an interesting part of the weapon arsenal. There is a possibility that the TR3A was...

The cyborg lichen can be one of the most exotic visions of what the high-tech civilization might look like.

.     The cyborg lichen can be one of the most exotic visions of what the high-tech civilization might look like. Above is the image of the nano-submarine. There is introduced an idea, that this kind of system would equip with living neurons, which makes it like some kind of artificial bug or mosquito. The idea is that the robot can take the nutrient by using the robot tube, which acts like a proboscis. The neurons can get nutrients and the rest of the machine can use small fuel cells or the energy to that system can deliver by using the radio waves. Futurologists are thinking about the ideas, what the hybridization of the neurons and machine would look like? Could the hyper-technical civilization look like the group of midget submarines? Those submarines might take nutrients for the neurons, what is living in them. The purpose of the midget submarines, which might be size less than a couple of millimeters would maximize the survivability of the neurons. One of the most intere...