Skip to main content

Have the robots of tomorrow the same rights as humans?

  Have the robots of tomorrow the same rights as humans?


Research of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and self-learning Intelligent robots and advanced computer technology has been rise the question of what is the description of life? Is the aware robot what acts like a living organism the thing, what should describe as an organism, what has the same rights as humans. 

If we are thinking of the machine, what emulates feelings, we might say that the machine just emulates those things. But then we must realize that the world is full of people who are not showing their feelings at all, and how can we think that some machine only emulates them? 

And how we know that the person next to us does not just act, that they even care what they are done even they say "sorry"? Most of us have been in a situation, where we are saying politely that we are regretful, but we don't care anything about what we just said. In many places like hotels and restaurants, the crew says many times in the day that "pardon me" or "we polite" when some people are sitting around a reserved table and they must change their place. 

Same way, when some robot what has an artificial sense of touch can say that it is sorry if it pushes something. The artificial sense of touch is quite easy to make. The thing requires artificial skin where is the metal bites. The system can use contacts, which means that when the robot touches something, the metal bites touch each other in the two-layer structure. 

And otherwise, the inner trunk of the robot can sue laser-LEDs or radar to mater the changes in the distance of the rubber layer. The inner trunk must just cover with radar transmitters what can meter the distance of the metal bites or RFID sensors and of course, that thing can be used to make 360 degrees radar images of things around that machine. When a robot notices that it pushes people, it can say that "I'm sorry". That thing can compare with dolls, which are saying "mother" when somebody pushes their stomach. 

The system is acting the same way in those robots, which are using artificial intelligence. When the robot notices the form of the human, it says that it's sorry. And interactive artificial intelligence might have millions of words and word connections that it can use in social situations. 


Can intelligent Von Neumann robots fill the description of the living organism?


The fact is that if we would have the intelligent Von Neumann-machine, what can make unlimited copies of itself, it can be undead. The quantum computers and versatile artificial intelligence with advanced machine learning can make the robot probe more intelligent than a human, and that robot can make copies of itself, where it transfer its memories and programs. Von Neumann-machine or self-replicating machine is one of the examples of the things, which can make a perfect or 1:1 copy of themselves and it can also transfer the memories to the next generation of those robots. 

So that kind of robot can be the base of the robot civilization. And if the robot is aware that means it will protect itself and its mates, as well as living organisms, are protecting themselves. But the fact is that even the human race doesn't want to say that some walking metal can is not living and it would not have any kind of rights. 

The fact is that we can tell that kind of thing everywhere until we are meeting the robot what tells that it's a very sensitive thing, and when we are at the front of the laser gun of that robot, we might have two choices. We might accept or deny that thing. And the fact is that we have ever at least officially met the intelligent robot that is not created by us. And officially we have no contact with robot civilization.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of