Skip to main content

What if we would make the repair for working life, and transform to work from home?





What if we would make the repair for working life, and transform to work from home?

The purpose of remote work is to make working-life flexible?

There are a couple of arguments against that thing, and some of them are real, but some of them are only the cause of attitudes. The traditions in working life are so deep in our mind, that we are forgetting, that some regulations, what are made over a hundred years might base the old technology. 

So what are the things, which are against the remote-working? And how we can solve them? The remote-work is an ecological solution for pollution and carbon dioxide levels if that thing works properly, and that requires that people are handling their work, have proper training and also the work must be work, what can be done remotely. 

The idea is that remote work means "work" not computer games or social media

Every person in the working life cannot do those things, and some people are telling that social relationships are ending because of remote work. So how many social moments would you have during the working day, honestly? Remote work has been created for making working life flexible and more effective. 

There are some thoughts, that for workers would have the ability to work remotely in free time. This kind of idea is really interesting, because when people are visiting the office for working that means, that when those people are off-duty, they have free time. The main thing in the remote-work is that the work must be done. 

1) There are not enough gates for the VPN-connections in the firewall. 

In the Reader's Digest would read "call you micro support, that they open more holes to firewall". But another thing is that we should ask honestly, how many workers need the VPN- or some extra-secure connections? Should we always be so secured? 

Are we always use secured communication, when we are visiting at banks? Why we would not reserve VPN-connections to personnel, who need them, because that thing makes them also faster?

2) VPN-connections are too slow

The thing is that social media can be shut down, while people are using VPN-connections or workplaces computers. Those computers should be reserved for work, and that means that people could use own mobile telephones and other equipment for that kind of work. 

That means that in the house could be two networks, the network, what is reserved for secured work, and the "public" or "visitor" network, where people can connect their mobile systems. If the workplace handles classified information, that thing must be made by using secured systems. 

And for secure communications could be used encrypted modems or mobile telephones, what is used only for that kind of thing, and adjusted by qualified persons. But does every worker need that communication? The VPN-connections should be used only when it's necessary. 

The thing why VPN is slow is caused that, when the VPN is on, the system takes contact with the internet by using the targeted computer as the host. That means that the VPN, what is connected to the server would cause slowing of the internet if people are watching movies etc by using that connection. 

3) The remote work is hard to control

When we are thinking about education and network courses, who controls things like the maker of the work? In those cases, the person who returns the code is not always even visit the school, and that means that the work can be made by some company or big brother.

And also things like USB-sticks are invented, and that means that people can make their work everywhere when they want, and then save that thing to the work- or education the places computer. The thing is that, if we want to change the data, what tells about the maker of the work, we must just make one point in the document, and save it back, by using the workplace computer.

Or copy-paste the data from the document, and transfer it to the controlled document. And after that save the file. Also, that data, what tells the maker can be changed by hands. So that's the thing, what makes this kind of argument of control meaningless. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of