Skip to main content

Every mutation is not favorable.




Every mutation is not favorable. 

Sometimes philosophers have thought what the creature like the small population of the human race would advance only one thing in the body, and that thing would be level of intelligence. Would the result of this thing some kind of space civilization, which cannot even land on the planets, because their body would turn too weak.

We can think that if we would sit on the chair and look at some screen, that would increase our level of intelligence because that is making possible to deliver nutrient to brains and make more connections between the Neurons. But in real life, the thing is not like that.

Every nutrient bite, what is released when we are sitting doesn't go to advance our brains. And this kind of thing is dangerous for people. If we want to improve our ability to process the data, we must create connections between neurons, and at the same time create more neurons, which is connected to other neurons.

So in this case, we should create bigger brains with more neurons and connections. But that thing is not enough. We would need the useful data, what to process in those super brains. Because if we would not have any data to process, our brains would be useless, if there is nothing to do with them. Without data, our brains would be the only thing, what takes nutrient from the body.

Why natural selection has started to favor intelligent individuals in the human race? Why that advantage has not happened with other species?

And if we are thinking about natural selection, there must be something that causes that the selection would start to favor the individuals, which is highly intelligent. That selection has caused our brain capacity has started to advance.

The idea of mutations is one of the key elements in the thing, what we are calling as the Evolution theory. The thing is that the mutation is not always favorable, and that means that when the species would advance that requires billions of the transformations of the sequences and order of the bases of the DNA, and as I have said every change in that order is not favorable.

So when the species is advancing there is billions of possibilities, that some mutation is favorable. And when we are thinking about intelligent capacities, there are many other things, what we should advance because if we would increase only the intelligent capacities of the population, that would cause the creation of the classic "humanoid" or "intelligent creature". That creature would have weak muscles and a big head.

But what happens if that creature would live on the Earth. The highly orientated creation of the advancing of brains would cause the rest of the body would be too weak, to carry the creature. And that's why this thing would not work on Earth.

So where this kind of creature could live. The answer is the zero-gravity environment. In those fully controlled conditions, there is a possibility that the creature would transform into a thing, that has only weak muscles and big brains left. But this kind of thing is I hope, hypothetical way to think.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of