Eyes, books, and science

Eyes, books, and science

Are eyes "trusted source"? This is a good question. When researchers are making things, they are always or almost always searching the data from the "trusted sources", what means scientific publishing and books. Books have been the most valuable sources of data if they were published some famous and trusted media house, what has qualified personnel in work, who has skills to estimate the research results. And this means that books have been above everything in the world of science.

The classic image of the researcher is a person, who sits in the room, which is filled with books. And then we can ask the philosophical question, "what is the book"? Does the book contain the last data? Or should we transform to use the data, what is collected by sensors like giant radio- and optical telescopes?

We are always forgetting that there have been errors even in the most valuable researches, and one thing is that the advantage of calculation methods have been increased the accuracy of the calculations and artificial intelligence can search the mistakes in texts and calculations, which makes very large-scale accuracy for research. That means that artificial intelligence can follow even billions of particles in the data source. So why we cannot publish updated versions of the "Principia Mathematica" style books?

When the telescope is connected to a computer, what is using artificial intelligence, it can mark some star from another galaxy. And then this system can follow the chances of the location and brightness of the star. That thing can offer new data for astronomers and physicians for making their formulas better and more accurate.

But when we are thinking about things like books, that means that the books are written in the time, where the scientists have a certain capacity of calculation power in their hands. And that means the books are written in the past. They are telling about the time and world of yesterday. And when we are thinking about advancing science, we must realize, that the things, that are written in the books already exist.

Theories, what are written on the pages of famous books like "Principia Mathematica" or in publications like "Theory of General Relativity" are written by the best scientists, what the world has ever faced. Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein were the top scientists in their lifetime, but the fact is that if Einstein would not be critical to Newton, we would not have "Theory of General Relativity". And that thing is the fact.

Some people are saying that Albert Einstein or Niels Bohr created the thing, which is called Quantum physics. But in fact, when Sir Isaac Newton invented that the light has the particle and wave-movement form that means we can think that quantum physics is an invented person named Sir Isaac Newton. So is the light the speed stripe of the particle, what is called photon?

And here we are forgetting that science is advancing very fast. This day differences in the time of the early 20th century. When we are thinking that the golden age of the mechanical inventions has been the 19th century. The end of the 20th century has been brought us the genetics and CCD-cameras, which can be connected to telescopes and microscopes.

Those things allowed us to make films about the reactions, what we couldn't even see before. The CCD-systems allows making films about micro-sized cosmos and macro-size cosmos. Those films could be download to the Internet, and then the researchers can see them at home if they want.

And the Internet has been created the revolution of science. Data can be shared extremely fast, and artificial intelligence can compare and connect the data, which is collected from observations around the world. This kind of thing is making the life of researchers easier than ever before.

Or does that thing make life easy? The world is full of hoax information, and researchers should select the most trusted valuable information from the mass of data, which can be found on the Internet.

Image: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cc/NewtonsTelescopeReplica.jpg

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

The cyborg lichen can be one of the most exotic visions of what the high-tech civilization might look like.

. The cyborg lichen can be one of the most exotic visions of what the high-tech civilization might look like. Above is the image of the nano-submarine. There is introduced an idea, that this kind of system would equip with living neurons, which makes it like some kind of artificial bug or mosquito. The idea is that the robot can take the nutrient by using the robot tube, which acts like a proboscis. The neurons can get nutrients and the rest of the machine can use small fuel cells or the energy to that system can deliver by using the radio waves. Futurologists are thinking about the ideas, what the hybridization of the neurons and machine would look like? Could the hyper-technical civilization look like the group of midget submarines? Those submarines might take nutrients for the neurons, what is living in them. The purpose of the midget submarines, which might be size less than a couple of millimeters would maximize the survivability of the neurons. One of the most intere...

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog