Eyes, books, and science

Eyes, books, and science

Are eyes "trusted source"? This is a good question. When researchers are making things, they are always or almost always searching the data from the "trusted sources", what means scientific publishing and books. Books have been the most valuable sources of data if they were published some famous and trusted media house, what has qualified personnel in work, who has skills to estimate the research results. And this means that books have been above everything in the world of science.

The classic image of the researcher is a person, who sits in the room, which is filled with books. And then we can ask the philosophical question, "what is the book"? Does the book contain the last data? Or should we transform to use the data, what is collected by sensors like giant radio- and optical telescopes?

We are always forgetting that there have been errors even in the most valuable researches, and one thing is that the advantage of calculation methods have been increased the accuracy of the calculations and artificial intelligence can search the mistakes in texts and calculations, which makes very large-scale accuracy for research. That means that artificial intelligence can follow even billions of particles in the data source. So why we cannot publish updated versions of the "Principia Mathematica" style books?

When the telescope is connected to a computer, what is using artificial intelligence, it can mark some star from another galaxy. And then this system can follow the chances of the location and brightness of the star. That thing can offer new data for astronomers and physicians for making their formulas better and more accurate.

But when we are thinking about things like books, that means that the books are written in the time, where the scientists have a certain capacity of calculation power in their hands. And that means the books are written in the past. They are telling about the time and world of yesterday. And when we are thinking about advancing science, we must realize, that the things, that are written in the books already exist.

Theories, what are written on the pages of famous books like "Principia Mathematica" or in publications like "Theory of General Relativity" are written by the best scientists, what the world has ever faced. Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein were the top scientists in their lifetime, but the fact is that if Einstein would not be critical to Newton, we would not have "Theory of General Relativity". And that thing is the fact.

Some people are saying that Albert Einstein or Niels Bohr created the thing, which is called Quantum physics. But in fact, when Sir Isaac Newton invented that the light has the particle and wave-movement form that means we can think that quantum physics is an invented person named Sir Isaac Newton. So is the light the speed stripe of the particle, what is called photon?

And here we are forgetting that science is advancing very fast. This day differences in the time of the early 20th century. When we are thinking that the golden age of the mechanical inventions has been the 19th century. The end of the 20th century has been brought us the genetics and CCD-cameras, which can be connected to telescopes and microscopes.

Those things allowed us to make films about the reactions, what we couldn't even see before. The CCD-systems allows making films about micro-sized cosmos and macro-size cosmos. Those films could be download to the Internet, and then the researchers can see them at home if they want.

And the Internet has been created the revolution of science. Data can be shared extremely fast, and artificial intelligence can compare and connect the data, which is collected from observations around the world. This kind of thing is making the life of researchers easier than ever before.

Or does that thing make life easy? The world is full of hoax information, and researchers should select the most trusted valuable information from the mass of data, which can be found on the Internet.

Image: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cc/NewtonsTelescopeReplica.jpg

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying. Does the AI have feelings? Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans. What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions. In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1). A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true. The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains. Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series. So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog