Skip to main content

Artificial intelligence and the will to do something


Artificial intelligence and the will to do something

1) Could artificial intelligence have own will?

This question is very interesting because if we are making some computer program, and use it for some purposes, the computer drives program from the line to line, and it would not stop unless something will interrupt it. So if the robot vehicle would drive itself to the pit, that robot would try to come out from that place, until the fuel is ended.

So this is the thing, what we can call as the will to do something, but is this the idea of willing? Does the wasp will hurt us, if it uses its bayonet, or does the robot car show will if it drives straight through the roadblock because the programmer has not remembered to program the stop sign of the police?

When we are thinking about some kind of Mars rover, what is in the very long distance from the controller, that device might have an algorithm, what mission is to fix the errors, what the controller might do. And that thing would mean that the system can deny following the orders, what controller gives.  And that means that the machine would resist the person.

2) What if the machine has feelings?

Here I mean that the system might have an ability to follow the reactions of the people, and react to that thing. This kind of system might notice the changes in the level of the speech.  But it might have the infrared sensors, what are following the blood flow and also things like tears, and then react to that kind of thing.

So when we are thinking about the human-shaped robots, they might have an ability to act as spies in the society. But would those systems have the ability to take control, if they are seeing that some individual is under threat or misused? And what if the leader of the group is the individual, who misuses the power?

When we are talking about robots, what have feelings and what can show pre-programmed emotions to the people, that kind of system might be very dangerous? The things that are disgusting to us are natural to robots if they are programmed in the computer, which controls that device.

3) Is the revolution of robots possible?

Feelings are in a really big role in the social life of the people. And some feelings are created for protecting other humans from stronger individuals, but what if the robot, what can collect data freely would turn to defend the other robots. The thing is that the robot would have the ability to defend its master, but the programmer has left the input about the description for the dealer.

And in this case, the robot would be left on the front of some screen, and the setup program would turn on. Then the robot sees other robots and then starts to defend or liberate them. In this case, the robot might not have a conscience about what it does, but it has some kind of "bodyguard model", what means it starts to "think" that the industrial robots are masters, what are kept in slavery.

4) Is the conscience the need for a will?

But when we are thinking about conscience, that thing is really interesting, because of bacteria also protects itself against its enemies by making the protective slime. And that thing has caused the question, are those bacteria willing to live. So when we are looking at the robot, what is industriously making something, we can say that the machine doesn't have a will, because those actions are programmed in the mind or memories and controlling programs of that system.

So that means that will is only the thing that is coming from the keyboard of the programmer. But then the second thought is that also many other organisms like ants and wasps are defending themselves. So if we are willing to make the car, what can drive independently, but we have forgotten to make the algorithm, what makes the difference between police and ordinary people.

And that thing would make the situation that the car doesn't stop when the "stop sign" has been shown. So does that case make difference does the car realize, what it makes? Here we must ask, does the ant realize, what the wasp realize, what it does, when it would send pheromones to call rest of the swarm to defend some food source?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of