Artificial intelligence and the will to do something

Artificial intelligence and the will to do something

1) Could artificial intelligence have own will?

This question is very interesting because if we are making some computer program, and use it for some purposes, the computer drives program from the line to line, and it would not stop unless something will interrupt it. So if the robot vehicle would drive itself to the pit, that robot would try to come out from that place, until the fuel is ended.

So this is the thing, what we can call as the will to do something, but is this the idea of willing? Does the wasp will hurt us, if it uses its bayonet, or does the robot car show will if it drives straight through the roadblock because the programmer has not remembered to program the stop sign of the police?

When we are thinking about some kind of Mars rover, what is in the very long distance from the controller, that device might have an algorithm, what mission is to fix the errors, what the controller might do. And that thing would mean that the system can deny following the orders, what controller gives. And that means that the machine would resist the person.

2) What if the machine has feelings?

Here I mean that the system might have an ability to follow the reactions of the people, and react to that thing. This kind of system might notice the changes in the level of the speech. But it might have the infrared sensors, what are following the blood flow and also things like tears, and then react to that kind of thing.

So when we are thinking about the human-shaped robots, they might have an ability to act as spies in the society. But would those systems have the ability to take control, if they are seeing that some individual is under threat or misused? And what if the leader of the group is the individual, who misuses the power?

When we are talking about robots, what have feelings and what can show pre-programmed emotions to the people, that kind of system might be very dangerous? The things that are disgusting to us are natural to robots if they are programmed in the computer, which controls that device.

3) Is the revolution of robots possible?

Feelings are in a really big role in the social life of the people. And some feelings are created for protecting other humans from stronger individuals, but what if the robot, what can collect data freely would turn to defend the other robots. The thing is that the robot would have the ability to defend its master, but the programmer has left the input about the description for the dealer.

And in this case, the robot would be left on the front of some screen, and the setup program would turn on. Then the robot sees other robots and then starts to defend or liberate them. In this case, the robot might not have a conscience about what it does, but it has some kind of "bodyguard model", what means it starts to "think" that the industrial robots are masters, what are kept in slavery.

4) Is the conscience the need for a will?

But when we are thinking about conscience, that thing is really interesting, because of bacteria also protects itself against its enemies by making the protective slime. And that thing has caused the question, are those bacteria willing to live. So when we are looking at the robot, what is industriously making something, we can say that the machine doesn't have a will, because those actions are programmed in the mind or memories and controlling programs of that system.

So that means that will is only the thing that is coming from the keyboard of the programmer. But then the second thought is that also many other organisms like ants and wasps are defending themselves. So if we are willing to make the car, what can drive independently, but we have forgotten to make the algorithm, what makes the difference between police and ordinary people.

And that thing would make the situation that the car doesn't stop when the "stop sign" has been shown. So does that case make difference does the car realize, what it makes? Here we must ask, does the ant realize, what the wasp realize, what it does, when it would send pheromones to call rest of the swarm to defend some food source?

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

The cyborg lichen can be one of the most exotic visions of what the high-tech civilization might look like.

. The cyborg lichen can be one of the most exotic visions of what the high-tech civilization might look like. Above is the image of the nano-submarine. There is introduced an idea, that this kind of system would equip with living neurons, which makes it like some kind of artificial bug or mosquito. The idea is that the robot can take the nutrient by using the robot tube, which acts like a proboscis. The neurons can get nutrients and the rest of the machine can use small fuel cells or the energy to that system can deliver by using the radio waves. Futurologists are thinking about the ideas, what the hybridization of the neurons and machine would look like? Could the hyper-technical civilization look like the group of midget submarines? Those submarines might take nutrients for the neurons, what is living in them. The purpose of the midget submarines, which might be size less than a couple of millimeters would maximize the survivability of the neurons. One of the most intere...

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog