The end of the era is pandemics

The end of the era is pandemics

When we are thinking about the global economical areas, the thing, that is needed to take markets under the control is the capital. The source of capital means nothing. Only money itself affects. If we are thinking about hamburger restaurants, we can offer people chance to come and eat free lunch in those restaurants, and at the same time use subliminal messages, that some person, who attends to the president is the messenger form some other planet and then check would that thing bring more votes to some very charismatic character.

One of the best examples of globalization is in the movie "The Demolition Man", where the authoritarian ruler has been taken the entire USA under the control by using money, what that person has got from "Pizza Hut". If we want to take markets and media under the control, we can just buy the companies, what operating in some important area, and then get money for that action. The only thing, what we need is money, and the source of money can be a hamburger restaurant chain.

And if we have enough money, we can buy shares from the media companies. This opens the road to political power because by using the power of media companies, the people who are selecting the commercials can affect the public opinions by selecting the commercials, which are suitable for their purposes. They can select politicians who are driving their benefits.

When we are thinking about globalization, the thing, that we can say is that economics is always a global thing. The people who have money have always an opportunity to travel to other countries, and this is the thing, that makes the borders meanless to those people, who have money to make investments to another country. There are no borders that are stopping the financial globalization, and the money is always finding a route from one state to another. In the world is many nations, which are not want to make business with "non-democratic" nations, because that causes stress to the highest leaders of their states.

But the investments in those countries can make by using some country, which has good relationships with both sides as the middleman. This is the thing, which helps to keep the investments to the "non-democratic countries" away from the public eye. This is the thing, what we must realize before we are closing our borders.

The thing that people should think is that closing the borders is not guarantee that the workplaces are returning to some country. We think that closing borders are the solution, which guarantees workplaces and return of the capital.  We can always outsource the production to the third world, and then bring those products, which is produced in some Third World nation to the industrialized country if there is a customs border or not.

In the world, there is always a very small country, which has no choice to select its companion with the same methodology as some bigger nations, and those nations can be used as middlemen in that kind of trade. So the production in the third nation can be made by establishing the corporation, what has owned the company, what headquarters are in the capital of that same middleman or at some other country.

The thing is that operating straight in the "non-democratic" countries causes stress to the reputation of the businessmen. If we would create a corporation in some Third World countries, what guarantees that this company doesn't transfer the production to other countries.

When we are making contracts with people, who are living in India, what guarantees that the product is made in India? Or if we are making business with Chinese, what guarantees that they don't transfer the production to North Korea and in the case of India the real producer could be Bangladesh.

That might be a thing, what nobody wants you to know. If some companies can produce merchandise without any costs that would allow selling products at a very cheap price. This gives it the benefit in the business environment, which allows driving competitors to bankruptcy, and then that thing makes the centralization of the markets.

In this case, the large scale company, which has an effective delivery and marketing system can take entire marketing in the control. That allows it to order the price, what people must pay the merchandise. Capturing the marketing area would happen by pulling the price of the products to very low, which will cause the competitors to start to make defeat.

If the company, what makes this kind of things operates in many countries, that thing would mean that it can pump money in the one part of it. So when part of it makes defeat, the other parts of that company would help it, and this thing makes possible to take control of the entire marketing. And if we are thinking that way, the question is about money, and how much the operator can invest in that thing. So the source of the money can be the hamburger restaurant chain as well as an oil rig.

And the thing that is also problematic is that the conditions of the production are not at the same level, what they are in the European and North-American factories, and maybe that kind of thing is not wanted to show to other people. So what if we would close our borders from the foreigners?

Our citizens travel to the "cheap production countries" that can easily deny by raising the price of the flight ticket to the clouds. That denies travel to those countries very effectively. But how to deny those people travel to our country, and tell things, what is happening in far away from here? When we are thinking about the cheap price of production, we must ask "how those workers live" or "how long day one person even can work"?

There are many things, that cause suspicions that the prison camp prisoners are used in the production of the merchandise, which is sold to the regular markets. The thing is the cheap price and also a very large number of workers, what those nations can do in that production. This kind of production allows selling products at a very low price.