Skip to main content

Are we all creative and individual persons?




Are we all creative and individual persons?

Does school kill creativity and individualism? That is one of the most interesting questions in the world. The thing is that people need skills, what they are learning at school. So the school is really important for people because in that place we are learning social and other skills. And maybe "killing creativity" means that some people would not dare to bring their abilities in front of other people, and they are hiding the ideas that they are created themselves. 

There are many stories, that we are all intelligent and creative individuals until we will go to school, and there happens something, that destroys that thing, what we are calling individualism. The thing is that being productive and individual means that a person is also different than others. And this is the reason, why some people would not have the chance to bring their individualism out of their personality. In this theory, people who want to be individuals would not bring that ability to other people's knowledge, because they are afraid of cheaters. 

Is this true or false? The thing is that there are many people, who misunderstand this kind of thing, and say that people should not even go to school. This is one of the greatest misunderstandings of that kind of thing. Schools are really good places to learn social skills and other kinds of things, and when we are talking about education, it is giving tools to handle things. 

Social skills are not the thing, that we should always mention, but they are an effective tool in the control of life. If we are creative and individual people, who are creating something individual, we must also have the ability to follow rules and norms, what society is giving to us. There is nothing to shame if a person would want to make productive things, but there are always people, who are jealous of that kind of thing. 

So when we are thinking about Thomas Edison and Nikola Tesla, we must realize that those persons were extreme examples of the individualists, whose inventions changed the world. The thing is that those men were only two inventors, who made extraordinary things during their life. There are many other inventors, who were made many other things, which are similar way important as the inventions, what those people made. 

And when we are thinking that some of those persons are ever been at schools, we must realize that the school history of those persons might be destroyed, because of national security. That makes impossible to track those people by following their school history, but the destroyer of those papers is sometimes unknown. 

There is told many tales that Nikola Tesla ever went to school, but if you read the personal history of Tesla you mean that this person was in school (1). So, in this case, claiming that school destroys creativity has nothing to do with this case. The thing is that in school people can share their ideas with others, and that makes possible to advance and refine the idea. And maybe some of the ideas would turn true products.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of