Skip to main content

Writing about science


Niels-Henrik Abel
(1802-1829)

Writing about science

1) Science itself solves nothing, scientists are solving things

One very little notice about the grammar is that even if we are thinking that science proves or not prove something, we must realize that scientists are proving things. Science itself is an abstraction, or a group of methods, what the people should follow if they are trying to explain something or make something proven scientifically. 

The process to prove something by using the method, that it can be scientifically proven might take a very long time, and every scientist in the world are ever made their theories. And only a few of them have created theories, what are well known or even known in scientific societies. So there are many other theories than the Theory of Relativity, what is left in history as brilliant ideas, but they are not well-known. 

When we are thinking about things like mathematics, the entire science is virtual and abstract. But if the person would make some theory or prove it and wants to become a famous mathematician, that thing must be done by using the mathematical methodology. And if we want to solve some crimes we need to use methods, what is tolerated for the criminal investigation. 

2) The strange life of Niels Henrik Abel (1)

Here I mean the case of famous Norwegian mathematician Niels Henrik Abel (1802-1829)(1), who died at a very young age we must realize that there was something wrong with that person's life. Here I must say that the name of that person is unusual. And if we are searching for things, what happened in the life of that man, we might know, that this man invented the way how to solve the fifth-grade mathematical equations, but his main work would involve the parabolic theorems, what might feel meanless. 

But then we can think another way, and remember that the calculations of parabolic trajectories are needed in the artillery, as well as with the calculations of some vaults. And if we want to calculate the orbiting trajectories of the planets, we would need to calculate the parabolic forms. Then we can calculate the trajectory of the planet by using the observations about the interference that it causes to other planets. 

2.1) Parabolic theorems are needed in ballistic calculations, or in cases, where is needed to calculate the trajectory of the planets. 

And then the entire calculated trajectory would be photographed. But the thing is that this kind of thing is not the reason to make a murder. The hunt for planets is the thing, where the patience is in a great role. And there is possible that the astronomers have used those formulas also searching for "Planet X.  

But when we are thinking that the thing, what makes this man so interesting is the when Abel was in Paris, he wrote one article about mathematics and the inspectors for that work were ordered Adrien-Marie Legendre (1752-1833) and Augustin-Louis Cauchy (1788-1857). The last one lost the article somewhere "at the bottom of his papers". But the question is did somebody take that paper from the table, but if Abel was murdered, who was the criminal. 

That is the question, what is remaining in history. Sometimes I have wonder was the things, what happens to that man in early years in school, have some kind of connections to his early death? Was the violent mathematic teacher who baits the pupils in the cathedral school had something to do with the death of Abel? 

Did that person pay to some people, that they would kill Abel, or were some of those boys got the gratuitous recommendations for the university? Violent teachers have always some favorites, who are telling them things. Or were the marks of violence caused that the teacher was used some boys as the bodyguards, whose mission was to punish if somebody would try to resist them. Or did somebody think that Abel knew somebody, who has bought the graduation? But the death of Abel can be some kind of accident. 

2.2) The making solution for some of the fifth-grade equations

So when we are thinking about the calculations, what we can use for solving the fifth- and higher degree equation, we can try that thing by using many methods. The first thing is to try to create some kind of formula, which would give a straight answer. 

Or we can just benefit distributed law. That means that the fifth grade equal can be broken to the third and second-degree equals (3) or two-second degree and one first degree equals, which can be solved quite easily. 

This is the introduction about dividing the fifth degree equal to third and second degrees equals(g(x)ax⁵+bx⁴+cx³+dx²+ex+f )=(f(x) (ax³+bx²+cx+d) * (ax²+bx+c) But that would answer most, but not every fifth-grade equals. 







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of