Chaos is protecting us
How the famous Great Red Spot (1) of planet Jupiter connected to the sociology and effect of propaganda? And how that kind of phenomenon is affecting to sociological theories?
What if we would live on the planet, where the atmosphere is extremely stable? The result would be that each time, when the bird or butterfly would flap its wings, that thing causes the effect, where the giant hurricanes would be forming. If the planet would be covered by the layer of water friction on the surface would be very low. That thing causes a similar phenomenon what the Great Red Spot of Jupiter is.
The Great Red Spot is the stable whirl or storm, which hovers in the atmosphere of Jupiter. Somebody is asking what formed the red spot is the interference, which made that stable whirl a long time ago. The remarkable thing is the Great Red Spot is the high-pressure region, which is hovering above the low-pressure gas, and its the largest known anticyclonic storm (2) in our solar system.
The Great Red Spot is the anticyclonic storm, which means that it rotates the opposite direction to the gas, what is below it, and this friction would give it the power. The effect of the Great Red Spot is similar to radicals, which are against sociology. When people are justifying their way to act, that causes the heat, which would increase the will and power of the radicals. When radicals are acting opposite the society, that would bring negative publicity to them, but that publicity would make those groups thicker and improve the friendship of those actors.
And even if we are talking on the planet, what atmosphere is stable, the airflow can travel across the planet, and turn to a giant storm. The thing that forms the hurricane is the stable air whirl, and the thing, that denies the endless increasing the power of the wind is the landmass, which would stop the whirl. Near the equator, the whirl would get the power in from the sunshine and solar power would give power to tropical storms.
Why this thing is interesting in states? If we are thinking that the state is in order like some army the forming of the psychological whirl is more common in a stable environment than in disorder. Here is a possibility that the psychological whirl is starting to destroy the moral. In an environment, there are disorders, that disorder denies observing things like propaganda.
(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Red_Spot
(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anticyclonic_storm
Image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Red_Spot
The propaganda acts like a stable whirl are acting in gas
The trollers would not make their voice and agenda to hear, and that makes that kind of thing ineffective in normal life. The thing, that makes the psychological whirl powerful is that the messages, that normally do not seem important alone would activate millions of the users of social media.
And that thing causes that information would be delivered even by millions of users. In this case, people are acting like gas atoms, the one gas atom would not make the damage, but when trillions of atoms are starting to act the same way, that kind of thing causes destruction.
The thing that orders the growth of the whirl is the mass of the gas or liquid, which involves it. So the large whirls are more stable than small whirls. So if the large group of people takes part in the forming of the psychological effect that would increase its power.
Sometimes I have thought that if we would live in city-states the disinformation would be easy to stop. If the communication lines to the city are cut, there would not come other people involving in the trolls, and that thing makes it possible to deny the growth of the psychological whirl. If the small group of people is infected with propaganda, that thing makes possible to deny the growth of psychological whirl.
Small is always beautiful
Nassim Nicholas Taleb has said that the city-state is better than the national state, and the reason for that is that the city-state can make the laws and orders at the local level. So the thing is that the city-state is closer and it's in a smaller area than the national state. And the laws and orders are always made to please the local people. Let's take one example. There are two city-states, another is locating at the river bank and the other is in the dry area, and they must take their water for their irrigation system, cattle, and everyday life from some well.
Are the benefits of those city-states similar? This kind of thing is making a difference in the things, that are needed for living in the cities. So, in this case, making laws and other decisions, that are benefiting both cities might be extremely difficult. But the problem is that in this kind of case. Is that the thing that the decision is always made near people. And because the people who know the person are giving judgments, that thing can cause unfair decisions, and the thing is that the national states were formed because the city-states must defend themselves.
In this case, the ideal state for regular people is a little bit different than the ideal state of Plato (3). In Plato's state, the rulers had an extremely powerful authority, which causes problems in everyday life. The reason, why at least some part of the decision making and legislative authority has been given to the regular people is that they would also carry the responsibility of the common things.
In the very authoritarian system, the problem is that regular people would not report if they see that something was wrong. And then another problem was that regular people always blame the rulers if the decision would be wrong. And things like that in another city were in the place, there was a river. And another used wells, which meant that the needs of those areas were different.
The thing is that the hybrid state, where the models of the city-state and national state would be connected would be the best way to rule the nation. The problem with that kind of model is that here we don't speak about the republics or other models of the ruling the sate. We are talking about the areas of the rule. If the state is really big, there are geological and areal differences between the living, what the people would pursuit successfully.
Comments
Post a Comment