What somebody doesn't want to tell you about the tor-network?
How to explain that three other persons are standing around the crime scene, where one officer is strangling the victim to death? When we are thinking about the psychological profile of the dangerous people, we must remember one thing in the social behavior of the human, and that is that we are facing the cold fact, that people are wanted to support other people, who are similar with them. So if one person in the workplace has some kind of attitude, that means that other persons have similar attitudes with that one individual. And tracking dangerous persons is in a key role in predicting violent behavior.
The problem with tor-network is that it can use good and bad, as I have written many times before this, and I will write again and again. The problem is that tor-network type applications can benefit also normal businessmen, and people who are working in law enforcement. When we are thinking about the term, "dark web" that thing doesn't operate only in the tor-system.
There are also normal-looking homepages on the internet, where is sold things like splatter guns. But there has been suspicious, that some of those homepages are connected with international arm selling, and if the customer knows the right codes and the email address and bank account or some cyber currency account that kind of person can buy automatic rifles or even the combat helicopters from those homepages.
The thing is that there have been asked questions, why authorities would not close the connections with the tor- and other kinds of networks. The answer is that authorities are using that kind of network also in their covert operations. And also people, who are dealing with illegal merchandise require the space, where they feel to be safe. This is the thing in the tor-network.
If people would always feeling that they are under supervision they don't dare to make anything in their platforms. And that means that the opponents, who wanted to catch should dare to tell their opinions and willing. When we are thinking about a person, who has strong opinions of something, and who is accepting the violence, if it is targeted to the weaker object, that thing makes the risk of the violent behavior is lower.
And this thing means that this kind of person is a big risk for society. But then we can think that persons can be dangerous even if they don't own guns. If a person has mental problems the driving car in the middle of people is also one of the most dangerous events, what human can face. And if the anger management of the individual who drives a car or owns a gun is poor, that thing can cause a very terrifying situation.
Comments
Post a Comment