Skip to main content

Why describing the expanding speed of the universe is difficult?


.

Why describing the expanding speed of the universe is difficult?

When Edwin Hubble described the Hubble constant in the 1930's he didn't know how difficult the metering the expanding speed of the universe is. The thing that makes it difficult is that we are on the planet, which is part of the expanding entirety. And the Earth is moving in the same direction as the other universe. Or in the same direction with the segment of the universe where the Earth is locating. 

The thing is that if we would want to meter the expanding speed of the universe we must travel outside it, or the other version is that we must find the point, what is the opposite side of the bubble or universe, and meter the escaping speed between the Earth and that point. Then we must division that speed by two, and then we can get the expanding speed of the universe. 

And what makes the expanding speed of the universe so interesting? The thing is that when the big bang happened, that thing gave the punch for the shockwave, what we are calling as the universe. The thing about the expanding speed of the universe is that it describes the end of the universe. If the expanding speed of the universe is higher than the gravity, what is pulling the universe back to the point, where the big bang happens the universe would be open. That means that the universe ends its life in the endlessly continuing radiation. 

But if the expanding speed of the universe is lower than the gravity, that means that gravity wins. If gravity wins the universe is collapsing. And there is a possibility that the new universe is forming.  This thing requires that the singularity where all material in the universe is collapsing. And that is called the parallel universe. The idea is that the universe is the continuum, where big bangs are repeating one after one in an endless continuum. But there could not be endless continuums of the cases. There must also be the first and the last event in the series. 

But is the new universe similar to our universe? There is a possibility that the large mass of radiation and material would go outside of the affected area of the gravity of the universe which means that the universe- big bangs cannot continue forever.

Sooner or later the mass of the bubble is turning too low, that the new universe cannot form, and those universes would live an extremely short time because the material would turn too low. That means the long-existence entireties cannot form anymore, because the low-mass universe cannot stay a very long time until it collapses.

And low-mass universes are losing material faster than high-mass universes. So where that continuum starts, and that means that this version of the parallel universe theory gives more questions than answers. The biggest of those questions is where and when was the first big bang in that series? 

Sources:

Expansion of the universe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe

Hubble constant: https://www.livescience.com/hubble-constant.html

The Nature-magazine article: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02198-z

Parallel Universes: Theories & Evidence: https://www.space.com/32728-parallel-universes.html

Image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of