Skip to main content

What makes nuclear explosions so destructive?

 


Above:  Nuclear test: Operation Teapot - Turk 43 kt (1)1955


What makes nuclear explosions so destructive?

1) The particle radiation is higher energetic than photon radiation. 

The effect of the nuclear explosion is so destructive because the main part of the energy is erupting in the form of electron and helium ions, which makes the heatwave different than normal fire. The alpha and beta particles would heat the layers with a very high energy layer, and the thing is that the alpha radiation, what is the nucleus of helium or some other gas would transfer more energy to the layer than a photon. 

And the electron or cathode radiation is crushing the DNA, and the mass of the electron is also higher than the mass of the photon, which makes it higher energetic than the photon ever could be. So one of the reasons, why the nuclear explosion is so devastating is the particle radiation. But there is one other thing, what makes the nuclear explosion even more dangerous, and brings the most horrifying images in my mind. 

2) That thing is the shockwave, which has given the idea for the quantum cannon. 

When the nuclear explosion happens the atoms of the atmosphere would travel away from the nuclear explosion with the speed, which is the same as the nuclear chain reaction. And in some visions, the nuclear explosive would equip with the nanotubes, where is the air molecules. 

If the nuclear fission or fusion would happen in the middle of the nuclear material, that thing would push the air molecules away with extremely high speed. The reason for the destructive power of the shockwave is that the high-speed air molecules are forming the chains. They are acting like the pearls in the necklace, which means that they would create one large entirety. When that quantum chain would hit to the target, the energy of that impact would be higher, than any normal hit of the atom or molecule. 

2.1) Quantum cannon

The idea of quantum cannon is that this system shoots the atom rows to the target. Those atom or ion rows are similar to quantum wires. That thing will increase the energy of the particles when they hit to target. 

The thing is that the same technology, what is used in the quantum wires can be used in the quantum chains, which can be shoot to the target. That kind of system would be called the quantum ion cannon. In the quantum cannon kind of, the atoms would put in the chains or rows, where the first and the last atoms are replaced by using the ion. 

Then the first ion would be acting like a locomotive, and the last ion would make the row of the atoms be in the chain. The magnetic accelerator would accelerate this quantum arrow to the very high speed, and when it will hit the target, the energy that it transfers is extremely high. So that kind of thing might be the weapon system of tomorrow. 


More details of "Operation Teapot"

(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Teapot


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of