A couple of paradoxes of time travel

A couple of paradoxes of time travel

Superposition and time travel

When we are thinking about things like time travel, we must find out one thing. If we are coming to the past in the time, when we were younger or child we might make one thing, what we ever imagine. That thing is that we are making ourselves the superposition, and at that moment we would be two places at the same time. So if we bring something from the future, we would make the thing, what we ever thought. We would bring the same atoms to the dimension, what are already here. But the effect that we are making would be interesting because we would bring material away from the dimension, where we are living.

So when the particle comes from the future, it would send the energy wave across the dimension, and we would not know, what that thing causes? Normally material can cause very high energetic reactions in the universe and dimension, but the fact is that in the normal cases that mass and energy are not increasing in our dimension. But time traveling would increase the material in the space, what we are calling the universe or dimension. The universe is a thing, where is enormous mass material and energy, but the level of material and energy is stable.

Can a time traveler accidentally shoot younger self, if that character would meet the younger self?

And one of the most interesting questions is if we are traveling to the past, can we meet the younger us? What kind of effect will happen if we shake the hand of the younger us? Or can there happen the accident, that we accidentally shoot the younger us? And would we disappear in that case? This question introduced by Stephen Hawking a couple of years before he died.

One of the questions is, what if we would use the wormhole to the journey to the past. And what if we would not able to close that portal? The large mass of material would start to travel to the past, and what kind of things that effect can cause? Can it double the mass of the entire universe by pumping all material into the past?

The paradox is that does our elder person or rather saying creature has a connection to the past or are we independent creatures without other connections than memories? And would that memory transfer to the memory of elder us? Time travel causes many thoughts and the fact is that theory doesn't become practice immediately. But the student has shown that time travel itself without paradoxes is possible, as you might read from the article below.

Comments

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying. Does the AI have feelings? Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans. What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions. In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1). A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true. The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains. Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series. So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog