Skip to main content

The problem with qubits can be seen in the thinking hat of Gyro Geargoose.

   

.

The problem with qubits can be seen in the thinking hat of Gyro Geargoose. 

The problem with qubits can be seen in the thinking hat of Gyro Geargoose. But that hat can also be acting as a model of the advanced biocomputers brains of those birds are connecting by using EEG-detectors and computer technology. 


In that case, the brains of birds are forming one entirety, what is controlled by using a computer-based decoder, what codes the commands to the form, that the brains of birds can understand them. The computer will transmit the question to the brains of the birds, what are interacting with the computer. 


And that entirety can be acting by using brain core stimulation. When birds are solving the problem, the computer can decode the EEG, and the answer will be shown on screen or told to the people by using a speech synthesizer. 

I have writing about this problem recently, but the thing is that this raven hat is the thing, what is the problem with quantum computers. The ravens' brains are smaller than the brains of Gyro Geargoose. But together those birds could be more intelligent than Geargoose if they can put their brains to operate synchronously. But the way to make the synchronization of the brains of the birds is difficult. And the example is the sentence "We are the hat" which is difficult to model for the birds. 

The thing that might help is that the Gyro Geargoose might start to use three-word versions of the sentences. So the questions like "who are you" can share easily with those birds if the sentence involves three words. The problem is that if the questions are involving four words, that thing causes that the extra words are always going to the same bird, what would become strained. The stress should share smoothly with each bird, which is acting as a biocomputer. In that case, the brains of the birds are connecting by using technical equipment, and they are acting as the one entirety.

-----------------------

How problems must be share for those creatures that they can solve it?

This is the diagram of how the shared problem makes the mission lighter to one of those birds. Those birds might be not intelligent alone, but together they are forming the entirety, which might be intelligent. Like our brains, the Gyro Geargooses biocomputer acts as an entirety. One neuron in our brains might not be quite impressive, but together the brain neurons are forming the most intelligent and capable data handling tool in the world. 

Gyro Geargoose asks "Who are you?"

The question should share to birds like this:

Question----- Bird-----Answer

Who>>>>>>>Bird 1>>>>We

Are>>>>>>>>Bird 2>>>Are

You>>>>>>>>Bird 3>>>The hat

The Birds are answering "We are the hat" So sharing the problem between those birds, that thing makes it possible to make the problem lighter to them. And if that kind of thing can be done, that thing makes it possible to make the biocomputer, what is made by connecting the brains of the "lower species" in one entirety.

If that thing is done, the result could be the computer, in which brain capacity is higher than even the human race. The thing is that in this case, the creatures, what is making that collective mind might not be intelligent alone, but together they are forming the intelligent entirety. And then we can make the model that Gyro Geargoose can transfer the problem to those birds and when the leader will give the sight, the EEG would transfer the solution to the brain core of Gyro Geargoose. 

------------------------------------

The thing could be the answer to the question "who are you"? So the thing that makes this kind of thing interesting and difficult is that when Geargoose asks something, he should share that question with those birds, as the diagram above shows. If that thing would work, that makes things lighter for each bird. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

Who really was Plato, the great philosopher?

When we are thinking about the great philosopher Plato, we are thinking about the man who established the Academy of Athens. And we might remember that this man was a traveler. He traveled in many places in his life and wrote many texts and books, which still is very respected thoughts about the state and other things. When we are looking at the books or series of books, we are facing the thing, that there were lots of texts. If we want to use criticism we must notice that the model of the ideal state is rising the kings in the very high position, and the thing would flatter the kings. And sometimes I have thought that maybe that famous model of the ideal state is written by somebody else. The thing is that the model, where the philosophers rule the state behind the lines of soldiers could be written for the persons like Justinian, who was really flattered. The thing is that this kind of writings was meant for flatter the rulers, who would not persecute philosophers, even they had d...