Skip to main content

The problem with qubits can be seen in the thinking hat of Gyro Geargoose.

   

.

The problem with qubits can be seen in the thinking hat of Gyro Geargoose. 

The problem with qubits can be seen in the thinking hat of Gyro Geargoose. But that hat can also be acting as a model of the advanced biocomputers brains of those birds are connecting by using EEG-detectors and computer technology. 


In that case, the brains of birds are forming one entirety, what is controlled by using a computer-based decoder, what codes the commands to the form, that the brains of birds can understand them. The computer will transmit the question to the brains of the birds, what are interacting with the computer. 


And that entirety can be acting by using brain core stimulation. When birds are solving the problem, the computer can decode the EEG, and the answer will be shown on screen or told to the people by using a speech synthesizer. 

I have writing about this problem recently, but the thing is that this raven hat is the thing, what is the problem with quantum computers. The ravens' brains are smaller than the brains of Gyro Geargoose. But together those birds could be more intelligent than Geargoose if they can put their brains to operate synchronously. But the way to make the synchronization of the brains of the birds is difficult. And the example is the sentence "We are the hat" which is difficult to model for the birds. 

The thing that might help is that the Gyro Geargoose might start to use three-word versions of the sentences. So the questions like "who are you" can share easily with those birds if the sentence involves three words. The problem is that if the questions are involving four words, that thing causes that the extra words are always going to the same bird, what would become strained. The stress should share smoothly with each bird, which is acting as a biocomputer. In that case, the brains of the birds are connecting by using technical equipment, and they are acting as the one entirety.

-----------------------

How problems must be share for those creatures that they can solve it?

This is the diagram of how the shared problem makes the mission lighter to one of those birds. Those birds might be not intelligent alone, but together they are forming the entirety, which might be intelligent. Like our brains, the Gyro Geargooses biocomputer acts as an entirety. One neuron in our brains might not be quite impressive, but together the brain neurons are forming the most intelligent and capable data handling tool in the world. 

Gyro Geargoose asks "Who are you?"

The question should share to birds like this:

Question----- Bird-----Answer

Who>>>>>>>Bird 1>>>>We

Are>>>>>>>>Bird 2>>>Are

You>>>>>>>>Bird 3>>>The hat

The Birds are answering "We are the hat" So sharing the problem between those birds, that thing makes it possible to make the problem lighter to them. And if that kind of thing can be done, that thing makes it possible to make the biocomputer, what is made by connecting the brains of the "lower species" in one entirety.

If that thing is done, the result could be the computer, in which brain capacity is higher than even the human race. The thing is that in this case, the creatures, what is making that collective mind might not be intelligent alone, but together they are forming the intelligent entirety. And then we can make the model that Gyro Geargoose can transfer the problem to those birds and when the leader will give the sight, the EEG would transfer the solution to the brain core of Gyro Geargoose. 

------------------------------------

The thing could be the answer to the question "who are you"? So the thing that makes this kind of thing interesting and difficult is that when Geargoose asks something, he should share that question with those birds, as the diagram above shows. If that thing would work, that makes things lighter for each bird. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of