Skip to main content

Thoughts about two trees

   




Thoughts about two trees

In the image above this text is two trees. Another tree seems very nice and colorful, but the other is still green. When we are thinking about this canvas, the green tree assimilates, and they are good for the environment.  But red trees are looking better. 

Colorful trees are a beautiful thing, but they don't benefit anybody. The thing is that the good-looking tree doesn't be photosynthetic, and it just creates carbon dioxide because the red tree is transforming to use the night reaction. The green trees are producers but they need sunlight for that thing. During the dark time plants are like other organisms.

When trees and other plants are in the dark, they are producing carbon dioxide. But the green tree, what might look like very modest, when they are the side of the colorful tree are using photosynthesis, and they are decreasing the level of carbon dioxide, but the thing what we must remember is that the carbon dioxide stress of trees are positive only if the tree is producing more oxygen than carbon dioxide during its lifetime. If the tree spends a very long time in the dark, that means that the carbon dioxide stress of the tree is negative. 

So in this text, the positive carbon dioxide stress means the situation, where the effect on the atmosphere is positive, which means that the level of greenhouse gasses is decreasing. And negative carbon dioxide stress means the situation, where the plants are producing more carbon dioxide than oxygen during its lifetime. And this is the thing that makes things like using wood or peat problematic energy sources. 

When we are burning peat and wood that thing releases the carbon that is involving in that material back to the atmosphere. So if we want to make the ecological fuel by using the peat or other organic materials, we must remember that the positive carbon dioxide stress is possible only, when those plants are releasing more oxygen than they use during their lifetime. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of