Skip to main content

Thoughts about autonomy and independence.

 




Thoughts about autonomy and independence. 


Hong Kong is part of China, and that means that the laws of China are also laws of Hong Kong. This is the thing, that we must realize when we are talking about the relationship with China. I don't know any other cases, where single cities can make contracts with other countries, even they are some kind of special economic area. 


The thing is that the term "special economical area" is the term, which is not defined anywhere. Does that mean the state, autonomic area, or something else? If the term means the autonomic area, what the autonomy means at this time. 


If some area has the status of an autonomic area, that doesn't mean the same thing with independence. Autonomy means that area has limited rights to enact laws. But that means the central government has the last word in every law and the foreign policy is made under the command of the central government. 


In the international fields, autonomy means that the area is part of some other nation. And because the area is part of the other state, the autonomy can disband, when the central government wants. If the central government wants to use force against the protests, what this kind of decision causes, that thing is the internal law of the conflicts says, that the use of force is the internal affair of the nation. 


So the thing is that if some people are returned to Hong Kong, that means that the authorities of China can send them to "re-education camps". And this is the problematic thing in international law. When superpowers are reading that law, there is always very tricky and complicated translations about that thing. 


And nuclear weapons are an effective tool for making the translations more suitable for the superpowers or rather saying nuclear-armed states. The reason for the arms race is that when nations have a great strike force, they will have respect for their willingness. 


So the thing is that superpowers can blame themselves for the new nuclear race. The nuclear armament race is the result of international policy, where those weapons are the reason, that justifies everything. Nuclear weapons are guaranteed the permanent seat in the United Nations Security Council. 


The veto-right or the right to deny the decisions of the United Nations might seem non-democratic. It is given for the permanent member of the Security Council because every permanent nation in the Security Council is owners of nuclear weapons. So the reason for that right is that the afraid of the use of nuclear weapons. This thing causes that nations are making nuclear weapons for getting respect in the international field. 


Image: https://www.dailyfinland.fi/assets/news_photos/2020/01/03/image-13837.jpg

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The story of (Northrop?) TR3A "Black Manta"

    Image I The story of (Northrop?) TR3A "Black Manta" Sometimes there have been discussions that the mysterious TR3A "Black Manta" was a study project for the B-2 bomber.  That means that TR3A was used as the flying mockup for testing the aerodynamic and control solutions for the B-2 "Spirit" bomber. The thing that supports this thing is that the manufacturer of both planes is Northrop corporation.  Along with "Aurora" was flying one other mysterious aircraft, TR3A "Black Manta". The system is described as the "Stealth VTOL" (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) aircraft. Unless the mysterious TR3B, the Northrop TR3A is the conventional VTOL-aircraft, what is using regular jet engines, but what has the stealth-body.  Image II The thing is that the stealth-reconnaissance aircraft, which uses a similar technology with the Northrop B-2 bomber would be an interesting part of the weapon arsenal. There is a possibility that the TR3A was...
Post a Comment
Read more

What kind of place would the locked planet be?

  What kind of place would the locked planet be? Have you ever thought, what could be live on the planet, which is orbiting the red dwarf? The hypothetical planet would be, of course, locked and that means that the other side of it would be extremely hot, and the other side will be freezing. In this text, the hypothetical planet would have an atmosphere, but could there be lifeforms? The thing is that there could be some kind of primitive life forms like some kind of fungus, which would pull themselves inside the ground if the red dwarf will be erupting.  And the lifeforms of that planet would need to synchronize their life with the red dwarf. So when the eruption of the red dwarf will begin, all the lifeforms must go in cover. And that means that all movements on the planet will end, while those hypothetical lifeforms would go to cover. But what that planet would look like? At first, we should describe what kind of planet our locked world could be?  The reality is if tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...
Post a Comment
Read more