Skip to main content

The critics of the private space programs

 



The critics of the private space programs


The space stations are medal, what has two sides


Many times the security aspects of the private space programs are causing discussions. If somebody can send the bombardment vehicle to the orbiting trajectory, that actor can dominate the entire Earth. The importance of space noticed by the USAF along with the Soviet Union in the 1960s. 


During that era, the Soviet Union send the highly classified military space stations to the outer space, what code-name was "Almaz". There were tested manned and unmanned defense space solutions during that program, and the space stations, what was involved in this program were Salyut 1 (OPS-1), Salyut 3 (OPS-2), and Salyut 5 (OPS-3). There were also tested many other systems like the modified Soyuz capsule. The USA and the other competitors of the Soviet Union were so quiet about that kind of program makes it concerning. 


The contracts that are prohibiting positioning the weapons to space are only paper if nobody even tries to follow them. And even if the "Almaz" was done before that contract, the ASAT and ABM programs continue even today. 


Also, USAF planned to make its military space laboratory called MOL (Manned Orbiter Laboratory) for operating along with Gemini-program. "Almaz"-stations were used to test things like machine guns in the space. And the solutions, where the ammunition was actually rocket seemed promising. 


The problem with the material weapons in the space is recoil. There were created the rocket ammunition, which was shot in the system that looked like rapid firing bazooka. The ignition of the ammunition happened by electric induction, and the idea was stolen from the "Gyrojet" pistols. 


I don't know did that kind of system tested in space. But "Almaz" was controlled by the Soviet Air Force. And there were tested the space cannons. 


Almaz: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almaz


MOL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manned_Orbiting_Laboratory


Soviet space cannon: https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a18187/here-is-the-soviet-unions-secret-space-cannon/


Image: https://www.wearethemighty.com/history/soviet-space-cannon-in-orbit

------------------------------------------


Criticism against space programs. 


Secrecy is the thing that causes theories. So the opinion of the people is that everything must be told. And also the possibility of the misuse of the systems must be understood. One of the best examples of this kind of case is the Internet. 


The same system, which offers the ultimate platform for making remote surgery and limitless information also can be used as the ultimate control platform that destroys privacy and keeps dictators in power. The same way space stations can use as the bombardment platforms. 


There is also criticism against large-size space stations and space hotels. The thing is that those platforms can be used in a horrible way wrong. Large-size space stations can also be used as the weaponized platforms to control the Earth. If we are thinking about the possibility to make the armed space station, that kind of system would be quite easy to create. In the conventional versions, those space stations are equipped with rockets, which are used kinetic energy for destroying the target. 


Also, things like steel rails are planned to use against the ground targets. When we are thinking about large-scale railguns like "rods of God" or "Project Thor" that kind of system can deliver precise accurate destruction like terminating certain houses in the city. The idea of this kind of military platforms is to make nuclear weapons old fashion. Also, those platforms can use high-power microwave weapons for controlling the aerospace. 


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment


And why these kinds of systems are causing criticism against space hotels? What if some terrorist hijacks that kind of hotel? The thing is that the experience in the zero-gravity conditions is quite an expensive investment. So if the space hotel is created for tourists. That means that the people who are traveling there are also precise targets for terrorists, who can try to shoot it with some kind of modified SCUD-missile.


This kind of modified SCUD-missile can have two or three stages and the small warhead, which weight is about a couple of grams. The kinetic energy system can break the core of the space stations. 


That means that the space hotel would need to have an electromagnetic shield against this kind of threat. And if somebody will hijack this kind of platform, the result can be devastating. But as we know the space hotel is the thing, that can be used for many purposes. So it can serve also as a laboratory, the platform of the crews, who are repairing satellites. 


But as we know the brightest visions have dark sides. The commercial space stations would give private actors the same operational capacity what the government has. So that thing should also be discussed. The thing is that privatizing space means that space flights will become cheaper.


And the problem is that the space shuttles, what can use many times have also come available for the smaller countries like North-Korea. Those small-size, multi-usage recoverable shuttles can be easily changed to use as the space fighters, which can attack against low-earth-orbiting satellites. But the small shuttles can also be equipped with the warheads, and use as the missiles. This is the thing, that we must realize when we are making space technology. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

Terrifying visions of genetic engineering.

 Terrifying visions of genetic engineering.  The modern Hounds of Baskerville ABW:s (Advanced biological weapons are the modern Hounds of Baskerville. The term ABV means the animal which is genetically engineered. And which is controlled by using some interactive electronic systems. There is a possibility to connect the action camera to dogs collars. And transmit commands to that animal by using electronic systems. Spoken words can use to the commands.  Or they can be a series of sounds that are stored in the sound files. When the operator activates a certain file that sound means a certain command to the animals. There is the possibility to automatize some commands by connecting the system to the image recognition tool. When the action camera sees something that is stored in the memory of the computer. That system sends the coded order to the animal.  Nanotechnology and genetic engineering are the most lethal combination in the world. The ABW:s (Advanced Biological ...

Facebook and dominance of the media.

The position of Facebook is dominating and that causes concern. Facebook is a well-known and commonly used service. And that thing causes that the information is starting to pile up in that service. That information contains data that we might want to hide. Facebook is a network-based service that can use for many purposes from marketing to intelligence.  Facebook was down and the thing cost about half a million dollars per hour to that service. That shutdown has shown how dominating that service has been growing. Facebook is a powerful tool. It can use to track the networks of people.  Artificial intelligence can show the network map of the people who are using that service. The data that travels between certain members of the network can show how often those people are contacting each other. There is a lot of criticism against Facebook but the fact is that everybody is using that thing.  The attitudes toward Facebook are conflicting. People are criticizing that service ...