Is there an edge of dimension somewhere?

Is there an edge of dimension somewhere?

Sometimes people have thought that the universes are following each other. When the universe has lost its all fuel, the energy cannot maintain the form of the three-dimensional room, and then the entire dimension starts to collapse. But energy cannot leave that room or dimension. And that means that would the reason for the big bang be, that the collapsing dimension would just pack the energy too small piece, that it started to expand.

One of the key elements in cosmology is that the universe doesn't the thing that limits the dimension. The universe is the bubble, where are the galaxies, and the thing where that bubble is the dimension. So there is no matter how many universes are in the dimension, the thing, what is matters is the question is, is there some kind of end or edge for the dimension?

When the material released from Big Bang that formed the ball-shaped universe. But then we can start to think about the question, what kind of thing is the rest of the dimension? Even if we would live in a multiverse, that means that those universes would be like the balls, what are in the room called the dimension. And one of the key questions is: would there be other universes in our dimension?

The thing, that makes cosmologists think about the space is the question does the dimension end somewhere? So when we are thinking about the three-dimensional universe and the multiverse (1) theory, we should stop talking about the space or universe. There are many multiverse theories and one of them is the parallel universe theory, and the complete list of those theories is at the source link two(2).

The parallel universe theory is not the same thing with the multiverse theory. Many are almost the same thing, but there are small differences with that kind of theory. The parallel universe means that the universe would be the mirror world, which is located in the other dimensions. The universes can also follow each other what means that after all big crashes will follow the next Big Bang. Multiverse theory means that the universes or bubbles are in the same dimension and at the same time. But the difference is not very big, and often multiverse and parallel universe mean the same thing.

We should talk about the dimension, when we are talking about the space or room, where is the bubble called the universe. This means that the dimension and universe are not synonyms, they are a little bit like synonyms but the dimension means a larger area than the universe. And then we can start to observe this thing and its interaction with multiverse theory. The idea of the multiverse theory is that there are other bubbles in the same dimension that are all universes.

So if we are thinking about the possibility that we are living in a world where are multiple universes, that doesn't remove the question does the dimension of space or room, where universes are ended somewhere. Is there an edge of the three-dimensional world, and what kind of thing that edge is? When we are thinking about the space outside the bubble where we are living we must ask is that area endless?

And if there is another universe the major question is also is this dimension lasting forever? Or does that thing meet it end somehow? Is that end the thing that the entire dimension would return to one single point when its energy will be lost or turn too weak, that it can maintain the form of the dimension?

(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

(2) https://www.space.com/32728-parallel-universes.html

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

Who really was Plato, the great philosopher?

When we are thinking about the great philosopher Plato, we are thinking about the man who established the Academy of Athens. And we might remember that this man was a traveler. He traveled in many places in his life and wrote many texts and books, which still is very respected thoughts about the state and other things. When we are looking at the books or series of books, we are facing the thing, that there were lots of texts. If we want to use criticism we must notice that the model of the ideal state is rising the kings in the very high position, and the thing would flatter the kings. And sometimes I have thought that maybe that famous model of the ideal state is written by somebody else. The thing is that the model, where the philosophers rule the state behind the lines of soldiers could be written for the persons like Justinian, who was really flattered. The thing is that this kind of writings was meant for flatter the rulers, who would not persecute philosophers, even they had d...

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog